Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
  • What is Misandry?

    What is 'misandry' and what is 'anti-misandry'?
    Misandry is the hatred of males as a sex, as opposed to misogyny, the hatred of women; or misanthropy, hatred of the human species. Misandry comes from misos (Greek μῖσος, "hatred" + andr-ia (Greek anér-andros, "man&quot. Those holding misandric beliefs can be of either sex. Thus it holds to common sense that Anti Misandry is to work toward removing misandry from our culture.

    Can you give me some demonstrations of misandry?
    Sure. Have a look at the second-wave feminist view of men for an example. Valerie Solanas, the radical feminist who shot Andy Warhol in 1968, provides a famous example of misandry in her self-published SCUM Manifesto. In case you're wondering, SCUM is an acronym for 'Society for Cutting Up Men', practically a call for gendercide, the culling of men. Quite literally, Solanas expressed her desire to "institute complete automation and destroy the male sex."

    Wow, this is pretty bad stuff - what can I do about misandry? For one thing, you can stop accepting it as a 'way of life'. Once upon a time, respect was a two-way street. These days it is more a one-way street where men are demanded to be respectful to women (even those who do not earn, or even try to earn it) while simultaneously disrespect of men is expected, condoned, perpetuated and even taught. You can make a difference by refusing to live this way.

    Did you just say misandry is 'taught'? Yes, that's right! The next time you switch on the television, count how many programmes have the token 'stupid boyfriend' or 'abusive husband' or 'paedophilic father' figure. Switch over to a children's channel / time window and watch how many cartoons or programmes reflect 'silly daddy' characters or 'bullying big brother'. Don't forget, of course, nearly all the women in these same programmes will be smart, sexy, sassy and full of beans, capable of juggling a career lifestyle with children, a husband and a social circle - let's not forget that she's undoubtedly a wonderful cook and always remembers everybody's birthdays. If these images are being constantly spread out over our airwaves, what does that tell our children who are growing up watching & learning daily, hourly, that men are just so stupid, abusive and ... well, useless?
    definition of feminism
    So is it more feminism's fault, or the media's fault?
    A lot of both, but neither would be able to indoctrinate our youth without the support of.... the government.

    Ahh - yes. The government. Tell me about their involvement?
    Well, they positively support and enforce feminist programmes of anti-male bias.

    Uh? Think 'Violence Against Women Act' - notice something wrong in that? Notice how violence against men or children is not mentioned? VAWA implies, through it's title alone, that men are the primary perpetrators of violence - despite 30 years of research and in excess of 130 scientific studies proving that intimate partner violence is roughly mutual. Time and time again, the results say the same "men and women are equally violent towards one another". And yet, when feminists demand preferential treatment or additional 'rights', the government promptly delivers, like a good boy.
    Lanavor22 likes this.
    This article was originally published in forum thread: What is Misandry? started by Marx View original post
    Comments 204 Comments
    1. janetdoe's Avatar
      janetdoe -
      Yeah, I've been reading up on this for a while now... it's odd how they changed from equality to superiority almost overnight.
    1. shaazam's Avatar
      shaazam -
      misandry is the government spnsored putting down of men and boys as second class citizens with few if any rights that can be upheld agin wimyn and incredibly to logic the wimyn now claim they are victims of the men suppressed by wimyn's laws !!

      the vinegar stroks for the wimyn is when her ex husband ( er partner whatever) is legally flayed in the feminit star chamber they deign to call a Family Court and rendered as a peonage slave to his ex wife as his worldly assets his wages/ salary in exorbitant instalments are transferred to her the cherry on the cake is usually his kids are legally kidnapped and transferred to her too as hostages to his fate were he to dawdle on his dues to her
    1. Percy's Avatar
      Percy -
      Misandry?

      This is misandry.

      Give a Dog a Bad Name. Pt.1.
      Christian J. - Amfortas & Christian J: Give a Dog a Bad Name Part 1 - SoundCloud


      The mass media is anti-male by commercial design. Comprehensive study data shows the depth of disrespect for men. Even ‘Old-school’ feminists are appalled at the damage being done to men. The media is ‘Wrong, both factually and morally”, says MRA Amfortas. Government pays for an agitprop war on men’s reputation to frighten women. At what cost?

      Give a dog a Bad Name. Pt.2.
      Christian J. - Amfortas & Christian J: Give a Dog a Bad Name Part 2 - SoundCloud

      Women have unconsciously adopted a habit of disrespecting men. Men are feeling profoundly disappointed, disillusioned and disgusted” and are withdrawing their support and protection of women. Society, and women in particular, are losing a valuable resource needed for its healthy continuance. The Love of men. Is this what women want?
    1. Unregistered's Avatar
      Unregistered -
      Um, could we please have referrences to these 130 studies you have cited that state "men and women are equally violent towards one another"...or at least clarify what you mean by 'violence'? Violence, I am lead to understand, is not always physical, and not clarifying this point could lead a reader to conclude that men and women are violence in the same ways.
    1. Unregistered but annoyed.'s Avatar
      Unregistered but annoyed. -
      Oh good, this perfectly explains why women are still being abused in the sex industry and continuously blocked by the glass ceiling effect.
      Also, if children are exposed to media where women manage everything, women are then expected to do everything. Girls are then pressured into being able to juggle raising the children, being the breadwinner and still having enough time to be a "wonderful cook".

      The two way street of respect that used to exist? Women didn't get the vote until 50 years ago! I might have believed you if you said 'two-way street which existed temporarily between the modern women and men rights movements', but really! Just watch any 1950's commercial to see how females were treated.

      Concerning spousal abuse: yes, it is fairly mutual, however, " many studies show that women suffer greater rates of injury due to domestic violence, and some studies show that women suffer higher rates of assault". Another statistic states that "estimates show that 248 of every 1,000 females and 76 of every 1,000 males are victims of physical assault and/or rape committed by their spouses"
      The VAWA was passed because overall there IS a higher rate of abuse directed towards women! And if men are concerned about male victim spousal abuse, there's is nothing stopping them from passing their own act.

      Women earn 70% of what men earn.

      Girls younger than 13 are regularly sold into sex trades.

      Please note that I don't hate men. I simply want equality, and I don't feel you're adequately representing all the facts.
      It's fine if this page is against misandry(which I agree is wrong in any society), but don't let yourself over-react and attack women just trying to stand up for their own rights and an equal society.
    1. Marx's Avatar
      Marx -
      Quote Quote from couldn't be bothered to even type a guest name View Post
      Oh good, this perfectly explains why women are still being abused in the sex industry and continuously blocked by the glass ceiling effect.
      Does it? Funny, I thought the article was about men, not women. Nonetheless, could you provide some recent instances confirming that women are being abused in the sex industry? Also, I would hope you are equally concerned with the glass cellar jobs that women are 'blocked' (translated: choose not to do because they don't want) from doing? Or perhaps you might also be equally interested in the lace curtain, part of the maternal gatekeeping issue that many men - self included - have encountered? Or, do you think ONLY women's issues needs addressing? Because as someone with real equality in mind, as oppose the feminist view of equality, I'd like to see some issues being resolved for BOTH sexes, instead of just one. Sadly, feminism has confirmed it is not remotely interested in equality as it focuses exclusively on issues from a female perspective only and ignores or marginalizes issues that affect men. Note, as one example, how you read an article about men & misandry and talk only about women.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      Also, if children are exposed to media where women manage everything, women are then expected to do everything. Girls are then pressured into being able to juggle raising the children, being the breadwinner and still having enough time to be a "wonderful cook".
      Which would you honestly prefer, to have your sex viewed as superior & capable - or clumsy and useless, only fit for derogatory mocking? I'm sure I know which one I'd prefer to be viewed as...

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      The two way street of respect that used to exist? Women didn't get the vote until 50 years ago!
      LMFAO that's hilarious!

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      I might have believed you if you said 'two-way street which existed temporarily between the modern women and men rights movements', but really! Just watch any 1950's commercial to see how females were treated.
      And look at today's adverts/sit-coms to see how men and boys are treated - today - not yesteryear. Why live in the past? Or is the past the only real grievance you can refer to?

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      Concerning spousal abuse: yes, it is fairly mutual, however, " many studies show that women suffer greater rates of injury due to domestic violence, and some studies show that women suffer higher rates of assault". Another statistic states that "estimates show that 248 of every 1,000 females and 76 of every 1,000 males are victims of physical assault and/or rape committed by their spouses"
      When rape is included, it obviously skews the statistics. If rape were counted seperately the numbers would obviously be very different. Most men do not batter women, most women do not batter men - but according to feminist indoctrination, all men are out to abuse & rape every other woman on the planet. How hateful a person must be to actually spread such sickening mentality unto others.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      The VAWA was passed because overall there IS a higher rate of abuse directed towards women! And if men are concerned about male victim spousal abuse, there's is nothing stopping them from passing their own act.
      All such crimes were already illegal. VAWA implies that women are more important and men are less important. Why would a group pretending to seek equality outright demand that violence against one sex be treated harsher than the other group? Clearly, it promotes sexism.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      Women earn 70% of what men earn.
      Women who earn 70% tend to only do 70% of the work that men earning 100% do. Taking holidays, sick time and so forth isn't men's fault. Instead of - yet again - pointing the finger of blame at men, try pushing women to work harder if they're not getting the same pay. One of my colleagues earns a lot more than I do - for the same job. He, however, starts at 8am whereas I would start at 10am. Is it discrimination that I opted to start later in the day or is it my own doing? Exactly - but in the mind of a feminist, it's so much easier to simply blame men - even for women's own choices.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      Girls younger than 13 are regularly sold into sex trades.
      So are boys - why pretend it's a one way street?

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      Please note that I don't hate men. I simply want equality, and I don't feel you're adequately representing all the facts.
      And to blame only men for everything, as evidenced by your post.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered View Post
      It's fine if this page is against misandry(which I agree is wrong in any society), but don't let yourself over-react and attack women just trying to stand up for their own rights and an equal society.
      No one is attacking 'women'...

      You see, here's a big difference. When feminists were fighting for such things as the right to vote and so on, many men and men's groups supported them; marched in the streets with them and wrote letters and gave supplies to help the cause. When men ask for equality in an area, women's groups either deny that men should have equality, fight against it or simply turn a blind eye to it.
    1. haahoo's Avatar
      haahoo -
      You are being very kind to it marx.. Your patience is admirable!
    1. outdoors's Avatar
      outdoors -
      Quote Quote from haahoo View Post
      You are being very kind to it marx.. Your patience is admirable!
      no doubt...

      f'n trolls who hide behind anonyminity- i still have a hard time believeing there are these kind of ppl in this world

      i am not sure why it does not register and debate it's concerns-this isn't a feminist web-site where it's posts will automatically be deleted when u don't agree with their agenda

      bring your "feelings" along for the ride
    1. Marx's Avatar
      Marx -
      I'm still cracking up about the 50year claim... that just demonstrates the level of lies, stupidity and ignorance feminists rely on so heavily.
    1. haahoo's Avatar
      haahoo -
      feminists come in two flavours, the "clever ones" who use the idiotology to advance their own personal agenda for controlling everyone (usually because they have no kiids to control, having killed them all). The there are the "victims" of feminism, who dont even realise it, but they actually think it benefits them..

      Well, they are just, dumb!!

      Then again, most folk are not exactly alfred ironstien are they?
    1. haahoo's Avatar
      haahoo -
      since they have had the vote for 50 years, and they make up the majority of voters anyway, everthing that has been bad for women in the last 50 years is surely the responsibility of the feminists isnt it?

      The worst thing feminists do to women, is piss off blokes who women rely on!
    1. Celtic Druid's Avatar
      Celtic Druid -
      Quote Quote from Unregistered but annoyed. View Post
      Women didn't get the vote until 50 years ago!
      50 years ago eh? Try 141 years ago! Making poorly researched flippant remarks doesn't lend credence to the rest of what you write (which is equally riddled with factual inconsistencies).

      Woman Suffrage Timeline International - Winning the Vote Around the World
      The first voting rights for British women began back in 1869. Remember, men couldn't vote for hundreds of years either, only but a tiny elite of men and women could.

      Also, in many countries women received the vote just a few years after men (just 2 years in New Zealand). Men only got the vote first in many western countries because it was an effort by governments as WW1 was looming to appease the growing power of unions, and secondly to act as both an incentive and reward for those men to fight in the great war (something funnily enough women didn't want equality in, but instead many participated in the White Feather campaign by shaming men into fighting).

      Furthermore, the greatest hinderance to British women securing suffrage was the suffragettes themselves.
      http://antimisandry.com/chit-chat-ma...tml#post210851
    1. nivek's Avatar
      nivek -
      A lot of women, especially feminists, seem to be of the deluded belief that all men had voting rights from the inception of parliament and that all men were involved in a vast conspiracy to keep women out. It really does not take that much effort to get a clearer picture of the realities of suffrage, as demonstrated by C.D's links which also lead to other useful links, even a quick search on wiki turns up some interesting stuff :



      Suffrage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Reform Act 1832 - extended voting rights to adult males who rented propertied land of a certain value, so allowing 1 in 7 males in the UK voting rights
      Representation of the People Act 1884 - amended the Reform Act of 1867 so that it would apply equally to the countryside; this brought the voting population to 5,500,000, although 40% of males were still disenfranchised
      Representation of the People Act 1918 - the consequences of World War I persuaded the government to expand the right to vote, not only for the many men who fought in the war who were disenfranchised, but also for the women who helped in the factories and elsewhere as part of the war effort. Property restrictions for voting were lifted for men, who could vote at 21; however women's votes were given with these property restrictions, and were limited to those over 30 years old. This raised the electorate from 7.7 million to 21.4 million with women making up 40% of the electorate.
      this gives a better perspective than an ignorant “women weren't allowed to vote wha wha wha


      not that there was much point in writing this as unregistered was probably just a petulant hit an run ...... but hey i aint got much on today
    1. Marx's Avatar
      Marx -
      Quote Quote from haahoo View Post
      ...everthing that has been bad for women in the last 50 years is surely the responsibility of the feminists isnt it?
      You're forgetting a simple fact here, HH... Women are never, ever respsonsible for anything, ever. Our unregistered feminist friend has pretty much confirmed that for us - as do most feminist folks. In short, if something is wrong - it's a man's fault. If something is wonderful - it is with thanks to women tho men are probably taking credit for it even though it couldn't have happened without a woman's input.

      Simple, see.
    1. Marx's Avatar
      Marx -
      Quote Quote from nivek View Post
      A lot of women, especially feminists, seem to be of the deluded belief that all men had voting rights from the inception of parliament and that all men were involved in a vast conspiracy to keep women out.
      Ah well this is part of the deception. They only mention when women got the vote and either misrepresent the facts in full by outright lying (e.g. 'men could vote decades/centuries before women') or leaving the uninformed person to draw their own conclusions. I know from experience that until I had researched this, I had wrongly assumed men were able to vote since ... pretty much, time began. Learning the facts behind the viel of dishonesty spewed forth by feminists, leaves a chap feeling somewhat deceived by those who paint themselves as superior.

      Quote Quote from nivek View Post
      It really does not take that much effort to get a clearer picture of the realities of suffrage, as demonstrated by C.D's links which also lead to other useful links, even a quick search on wiki turns up some interesting stuff :
      What's most interesting about CD's link is that it comes straight from a woman with a lot of detailed history research from a female-only perspective.

      On one side, we could ask - where is the blokes version of an equally detailed history on voting rights worldwide? Why is looked through from a female-only perspective? etc.

      On the other hand though, while that chaps version may be missing, it's at least worth a look through still because it does indicate how quickly the women were given voting rights - at no cost to their gender might I add - if the reader is willing to look up when men in those countries were also given (or, as in England, earned) voting rights.

      Quote Quote from nivek View Post
      ...this gives a better perspective than an ignorant “women weren't allowed to vote wha wha wha

      not that there was much point in writing this as unregistered was probably just a petulant hit an run ...... but hey i aint got much on today
      That is a common tactic of theirs, to throw in a stack of misinformation and then shoot off so they cannot be shown the reality of their lies & misinformation - for some it's downright ignorance, but for others it is an intentional tactic to get their seed of lies spread throughout as many places as possible.
    1. nivek's Avatar
      nivek -
      Marx : What's most interesting about CD's link is that it comes straight from a woman with a lot of detailed history research from a female-only perspective.

      On one side, we could ask - where is the blokes version of an equally detailed history on voting rights worldwide? Why is looked through from a female-only perspective? etc.
      True, i typed “male suffrage“ in the search pane on that page and got ........ loads more links to women's suffrage hahaha


      “computer says no!” lol
    1. haahoo's Avatar
      haahoo -
      Quote Quote from Marx View Post
      You're forgetting a simple fact here, HH... Women are never, ever respsonsible for anything, ever. Our unregistered feminist friend has pretty much confirmed that for us - as do most feminist folks. In short, if something is wrong - it's a man's fault. If something is wonderful - it is with thanks to women tho men are probably taking credit for it even though it couldn't have happened without a woman's input.

      Simple, see.
      TRue, very true. Although women are the equal of men in every imaginable way, it is not the case that they do bad things, only men do that, and when it appears that a woman is doing a bad thing, it is the case that a man was making her do it..

      Yes. They really are so truly equal to men that they in actual fact are unable to ever be less than that!

      (Unlike men, of course, who are not as equal as women and cant do some of the things that women do)..

      (Most notably being able to blame the other gender when they fuck up! Thats a uniquely female talent and every man just accepts that eh?)
    1. Unregistered "f'n troll"'s Avatar
      Unregistered "f'n troll" -
      I'm sorry, my article was written quite late at night, and probably should have thought things through better before writing (e.g. 50 years vote thing duh). As you've pointed out there are some flaws in my arguments, so I'll go ahead and see if I can fix them.

      Now, I was NEVER saying that any of these things were the fault of men and not women, just pointing out some things in the original post which appeared to be lacking.

      Concerning the vote: BBC - Radio 4 Woman's Hour - Timeline:When women got the vote note that one of those country only counts women as getting the vote in 2001. 50 years a hyperbole referring to most Countries, but never the less, you will see in other countries is stands correct.
      Also I am very aware that only privileged people (who owned certain amounts of land or assets or whatnot) had the vote for a long time until a few centuries go (but please note that it was difficult for women to actually own land in that time)

      @nivek, sorry I'm not a hit and run I was just having internet issues and didn't realize my post was actually sent.

      Abuse:
      "Among the persons killed by an intimate partner, about three quarters are female, and about a quarter are male: in 1999, in the US, 1,218 women and 424 men were killed by an intimate partner, regardless of which partner started the violence and of the gender of the partner. In the US, in 2005, 1181 females and 329 males were killed by their intimate partners"
      Not rape, murder. And even if it was rape, it still suggests that men rape women more than women rape men..

      Porn: How often do you see porn targeted at women, rather then men? Honestly, just browse the internet a little a pop-up will appear that proves my point. To be honest, I don't a problem with women choosing to do that, but it would be nice to see naked oversexed man on my screen instead.
      Just a side note to this: the way men are shown in this way is wrong too, particularly the emphasis on having a ridiculously size penis.

      Sex Industry: "Average prostitution arrests include 70% females, 20% percent male prostitutes and 10% customers." Either this means male prostitutes are doing a much better job at not getting caught, or this industry has a much higher demand for women. So naturally there are going to be more women in this situation. But then, if they're happy there I shouldn't bring it up/complain.

      About the way women are seen as superior in the media: I accept your point of view, and you have a good point. What I was getting at was that I personally (as a woman) don't like it any more than you. And if I had a choice, I would choose the reverse. I want the media to present my gender as imperfect, because I am! It would be best of course if they presented everyone, regardless of race and gender this way. But if you're going to make me choose...
      Think of it in terms of characters: in narratives there is often the clumsy one, the happy one, the intelligent one (etc) and the woman. Men make up all most other stereotypes. but the 'woman' character rarely has traits of another character stereotype.
      Most of the things I hate in media related to women (over sexualization, you must always where makeup and be thin and perfect etc.) are being pushed by women. There's this ridiculous loop where that we're struggling to break out of.
      Also, although women are apparently presented as 'superior', how many of them are the main protagonist and the hero? How many of them actually get the credit for 'saving the day'.

      Take for instance the video game industry. Although one might think that gamers are dominated by males,although more recently females have evened the statics. Yet when is there a lead female protagonist who isn't completely oversexed (see: Bayonetta, WET, Tomb Raider)?

      Glass Ceiling && Men's historical records: If you're going to argue women don't 'ask' for raises or choose high risk/profit jobs, then don't complain when men don't keep a record of their troubles throughout history
      "On one side, we could ask - where is the blokes version of an equally detailed history on voting rights worldwide? Why is looked through from a female-only perspective? etc."
      Personally I think the reason it's been seen from female perspective (and why feminists are so paranoid) is because women HAVE BEEN treated wrong in the PAST, and they're realllly fracken scared it could end up like that again.

      @All Men: if you feel you're being treated improperly in ANY way, make a movement! The only thing stopping you is the government which is 80% male (in the US), since it's so heavily dominated by men, there's no reason a VAMA can't exist.

      You said I'm only looking at the women's side- perhaps I am, but only because you're only showing the men's side.

      "Women are never, ever respsonsible for anything, ever. Our unregistered feminist friend has pretty much confirmed that for us"
      Yeah guys, I love your little thing about how YOU assume that I think it's always a man's fault. Seems like you guys have a bit of pent of anger towards women (or me specifically?) I don't fault men, I fault PEOPLE.

      Again, I'm NOT against you (I hate the way media presents both women AND men unequally). If you have a rally, I'll write my signpost and be there, please don't just speculate that I won't be there because I'm a heartless feminist and a "f'n troll"

      Okay I'm tired of writing this, so please go ahead and flame me like I suspect you will, and also a sincere THANK YOU! for not deleting my post.
      Human society would be so much better if everyone could be both genders.
    1. The "f'n troll"'s Avatar
      The "f'n troll" -
      You know, I did have a dignified response stating a whole lot of mistakes I posted, and a few more points to add,
      but I also just read some of Haahoo's forum posts and I've lost all respect for this site.

      I hope you fella's you enjoy
      getting some joy out of an otherwise unsuitable female one would not want to catch a dose off or impregnate!
      Because you're as misogynistic as hardcore feminists are misandronistic.
    1. Marx's Avatar
      Marx -
      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      I'm sorry, my article was written quite late at night, and probably should have thought things through better before writing (e.g. 50 years vote thing duh). As you've pointed out there are some flaws in my arguments, so I'll go ahead and see if I can fix them.

      Now, I was NEVER saying that any of these things were the fault of men and not women, just pointing out some things in the original post which appeared to be lacking.
      It came across that way. Not saying it's entirely your fault, but it did come across that way.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Concerning the vote: BBC - Radio 4 Woman's Hour - Timeline:When women got the vote note that one of those country only counts women as getting the vote in 2001. 50 years a hyperbole referring to most Countries, but never the less, you will see in other countries is stands correct.
      Right, but as we're in the western world, I at least tend to focus on the western world. I also had presumed you had read the other article here, The Truth about Women getting the Vote. Hence my laughter at your claim of 50 years. Nonetheless, I wonder when men in general got the vote in those same countries to which you refer. We're left to assume that all men could vote since time began, which somehow I doubt.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Also I am very aware that only privileged people (who owned certain amounts of land or assets or whatnot) had the vote for a long time until a few centuries go (but please note that it was difficult for women to actually own land in that time)
      It was difficult for anyone - man or woman - to own land. Women are not the eternal victims you think of them as.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      @nivek, sorry I'm not a hit and run I was just having internet issues and didn't realize my post was actually sent.
      All guest posts are moderated (invisible until an admin passes it). There is a message stating this when you submit a reply.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Abuse:
      "Among the persons killed by an intimate partner, about three quarters are female, and about a quarter are male: in 1999, in the US, 1,218 women and 424 men were killed by an intimate partner, regardless of which partner started the violence and of the gender of the partner. In the US, in 2005, 1181 females and 329 males were killed by their intimate partners"
      Right, as it states - regardless of who started it. IOW, if a man was acting in self defense - it doesn't matter. I recall a particularly horrific story of one guy who had been stabbed by his missus. He was lay on the floor in a pool of his own blood, wheezing for air. His wife was in the corner, shaking and anxious. The police stepped over his body and asked if she was ok. That's how little society cares for men.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Not rape, murder. And even if it was rape, it still suggests that men rape women more than women rape men..
      In England, no woman is legally capable of rape. Rape is specifically defined purely as a male crime. That kinda skews our stats a little.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Porn: How often do you see porn targeted at women, rather then men? Honestly, just browse the internet a little a pop-up will appear that proves my point. To be honest, I don't a problem with women choosing to do that, but it would be nice to see naked oversexed man on my screen instead.
      Women have their own version of porn - it's called Boons & Mills. Nonetheless, there is a lot of female 'visual' porn on the market too. I do, however, agree that the majority of visual porn is aimed at men while the majority of textual porn is aimed at women.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Just a side note to this: the way men are shown in this way is wrong too, particularly the emphasis on having a ridiculously size penis.
      Well indeed, and I'm sure you can understand that the man's oversized penis is not intended to please most of us guys who may submit to watching the occasional porn flick...

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Sex Industry: "Average prostitution arrests include 70% females, 20% percent male prostitutes and 10% customers." Either this means male prostitutes are doing a much better job at not getting caught, or this industry has a much higher demand for women. So naturally there are going to be more women in this situation. But then, if they're happy there I shouldn't bring it up/complain.
      Well feminism sold a lie that most prostitutes are 'forced' into the job... but this was proven not true, even though you seem to be insisting it is in your original claim. Most women are not forced whatsoever. There was a radio discussion between an MP (who was pushing this lie) and a woman who actually owned several prostitution businesses and was part of a body involved. She acted as spokeswoman and flat out denied that women are being forced in to this profession. Shortly after, a nationwide police operation was set up to try and prove the feminist lies that women were being forced into it. After a year of hunting and turning up stone after stone in efforts to find women 'forced' into sexual slavery - they had not found a single case, not one.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      About the way women are seen as superior in the media: I accept your point of view, and you have a good point. What I was getting at was that I personally (as a woman) don't like it any more than you. And if I had a choice, I would choose the reverse. I want the media to present my gender as imperfect, because I am! It would be best of course if they presented everyone, regardless of race and gender this way. But if you're going to make me choose...
      Well indeed, I agree - we shouldn't paint one as superior. Nonetheless, I genuinely believe being told that men are useless and abusive endlessly does have a negative impact. I've seen with my own eyes many women who actually believe that women are legitimately superior to men thanks to this mentality spread by feminist indoctrination. Feminist books sell ideas such that the Y chromosome is a 'broken' X chromosome, or even 'mutant'.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Think of it in terms of characters: in narratives there is often the clumsy one, the happy one, the intelligent one (etc) and the woman. Men make up all most other stereotypes. but the 'woman' character rarely has traits of another character stereotype.
      Most of the things I hate in media related to women (over sexualization, you must always where makeup and be thin and perfect etc.) are being pushed by women. There's this ridiculous loop where that we're struggling to break out of.
      Also, although women are apparently presented as 'superior', how many of them are the main protagonist and the hero? How many of them actually get the credit for 'saving the day'.
      I tend to agree with your point about not too many women being the hero of the day... but in reflection of reality vs propaganda - how many women TRULY will go out on a limb to be the 'hero of the day'? Nowhere near as many women will do that vs the number of blokes... War being a primary example, most women will hide away from such issues. Nonetheless, a lot of programmes now push this mentality that women are generally superior and can be heroes in their own way. Look at the last decade of gynocentric programmes on television; buffy, dark angel, tomb-raider, etc. Even children's programmes are 'programmed' with anti-male attitudes. My neice used to like 'peppa pig'. Daddy-pig was an asbolute idiot, he coudln't even manage to put up a shelf without mommy-pig's help, and just about every episode is concluded with peppa-pig (the child) stating with a giggle, "silly daddy-pig!" Mommy-pig is always the hero in this particular show.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Take for instance the video game industry. Although one might think that gamers are dominated by males,although more recently females have evened the statics. Yet when is there a lead female protagonist who isn't completely oversexed (see: Bayonetta, WET, Tomb Raider)?
      Women have typically not takn an interest in this field... so is it any wonder that the majority will be from a male perspective? Gaming is a highly visually orientated system and most women simply do not want to partake. Now, feminism has repeatedly blamed men for keeping women out - but I'd be interested in seeing companies putting a list of how many of both sexes they had applying for jobs when they've advertised. I'm pretty much guaranteed to see a result similar to the following:
      Job for gaming coder required - pay "awesome". Five women applied - 268 men applied.
      Of the 5 women who applied, they have no experience - of the 268 men who applied, 25 had experience. Of the 25 experienced men, 18 of them have been programming since teenage years at home on their PC instead of going out socializing. etc. etc etc

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Glass Ceiling && Men's historical records: If you're going to argue women don't 'ask' for raises or choose high risk/profit jobs, then don't complain when men don't keep a record of their troubles throughout history
      You appear to be saying that it is acceptable for feminists to lie about glass ceilings (by placing blame entirely on men) but it is not acceptable to point out that feminists misrepresent history by intentionally painting only half a story - and not telling their audience they are only seeing half a story. OK.... Thanks for clarifying.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      "On one side, we could ask - where is the blokes version of an equally detailed history on voting rights worldwide? Why is looked through from a female-only perspective? etc."
      Personally I think the reason it's been seen from female perspective (and why feminists are so paranoid) is because women HAVE BEEN treated wrong in the PAST, and they're realllly fracken scared it could end up like that again.
      So have men... but our history books don't pretend that it is ONLY men - feminism pretends/lies that it is only women.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      @All Men: if you feel you're being treated improperly in ANY way, make a movement! The only thing stopping you is the government which is 80% male (in the US), since it's so heavily dominated by men, there's no reason a VAMA can't exist.
      The point is, VAWA shouldn't exist in the first place as it promotes anti-male hysteria and blatantly anti-male sexism. When feminists pretend they just want equality, VAWA is the proof they want absolute superiority.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      You said I'm only looking at the women's side- perhaps I am, but only because you're only showing the men's side.
      This site aims to reflect the other half of the story that feminism ignores or lies about. Hence why it focuses on men - this site is a REACTION to the sexism of feminism.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      "Women are never, ever respsonsible for anything, ever. Our unregistered feminist friend has pretty much confirmed that for us"
      Yeah guys, I love your little thing about how YOU assume that I think it's always a man's fault. Seems like you guys have a bit of pent of anger towards women (or me specifically?) I don't fault men, I fault PEOPLE.
      The issue here, as has been repeatedly made but misrepresented by you, is feminism - not women. It is feminism's fault that men are treated like shit in today's society (not entirely, but for the most part). You complained about women being painted as superior earlier on, that too is because companies are petrified of offending feminists. You can thank feminism for a lot of anti-female campaigns as well as anti-male campaigns.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Again, I'm NOT against you (I hate the way media presents both women AND men unequally).
      Read above. Thank your sisters.

      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      If you have a rally, I'll write my signpost and be there, please don't just speculate that I won't be there because I'm a heartless feminist and a "f'n troll"
      Will you be there, like these feminists were there for abused men? I'm hoping not...


      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Okay I'm tired of writing this, so please go ahead and flame me like I suspect you will, and also a sincere THANK YOU! for not deleting my post.
      Unlike most feminist sites who silence arguments put forward to them - we have nothing to hide.



      Quote Quote from Unregistered "f'n troll" View Post
      Human society would be so much better if everyone could be both genders.
      No, gender evolved over millenia because it simply worked better than any other system.
    Comments Leave Comment

    Click here to log in

    spell "miss andry" correctly

  • Folks who have dropped by...

Banner
1e2 Forum