Yeah, I've been reading up on this for a while now... it's odd how they changed from equality to superiority almost overnight.

misandry is the government spnsored putting down of men and boys as second class citizens with few if any rights that can be upheld agin wimyn and incredibly to logic the wimyn now claim they are victims of the men suppressed by wimyn's laws !!

the vinegar stroks for the wimyn is when her ex husband ( er partner whatever) is legally flayed in the feminit star chamber they deign to call a Family Court and rendered as a peonage slave to his ex wife as his worldly assets his wages/ salary in exorbitant instalments are transferred to her the cherry on the cake is usually his kids are legally kidnapped and transferred to her too as hostages to his fate were he to dawdle on his dues to her

Misandry?

This is misandry.

Give a Dog a Bad Name. Pt.1.
Christian J. - Amfortas & Christian J: Give a Dog a Bad Name Part 1 - SoundCloud


The mass media is anti-male by commercial design. Comprehensive study data shows the depth of disrespect for men. Even ‘Old-school’ feminists are appalled at the damage being done to men. The media is ‘Wrong, both factually and morally”, says MRA Amfortas. Government pays for an agitprop war on men’s reputation to frighten women. At what cost?

Give a dog a Bad Name. Pt.2.
Christian J. - Amfortas & Christian J: Give a Dog a Bad Name Part 2 - SoundCloud

Women have unconsciously adopted a habit of disrespecting men. “Men are feeling profoundly disappointed, disillusioned and disgusted” and are withdrawing their support and protection of women. Society, and women in particular, are losing a valuable resource needed for its healthy continuance. The Love of men. Is this what women want?

Um, could we please have referrences to these 130 studies you have cited that state "men and women are equally violent towards one another"...or at least clarify what you mean by 'violence'? Violence, I am lead to understand, is not always physical, and not clarifying this point could lead a reader to conclude that men and women are violence in the same ways.

Oh good, this perfectly explains why women are still being abused in the sex industry and continuously blocked by the glass ceiling effect.
Also, if children are exposed to media where women manage everything, women are then expected to do everything. Girls are then pressured into being able to juggle raising the children, being the breadwinner and still having enough time to be a "wonderful cook".

The two way street of respect that used to exist? Women didn't get the vote until 50 years ago! I might have believed you if you said 'two-way street which existed temporarily between the modern women and men rights movements', but really! Just watch any 1950's commercial to see how females were treated.

Concerning spousal abuse: yes, it is fairly mutual, however, " many studies show that women suffer greater rates of injury due to domestic violence, and some studies show that women suffer higher rates of assault". Another statistic states that "estimates show that 248 of every 1,000 females and 76 of every 1,000 males are victims of physical assault and/or rape committed by their spouses"
The VAWA was passed because overall there IS a higher rate of abuse directed towards women! And if men are concerned about male victim spousal abuse, there's is nothing stopping them from passing their own act.

Women earn 70% of what men earn.

Girls younger than 13 are regularly sold into sex trades.

Please note that I don't hate men. I simply want equality, and I don't feel you're adequately representing all the facts.
It's fine if this page is against misandry(which I agree is wrong in any society), but don't let yourself over-react and attack women just trying to stand up for their own rights and an equal society.

Quote from couldn't be bothered to even type a guest name

Oh good, this perfectly explains why women are still being abused in the sex industry and continuously blocked by the glass ceiling effect.

Does it? Funny, I thought the article was about men, not women. Nonetheless, could you provide some recent instances confirming that women are being abused in the sex industry? Also, I would hope you are equally concerned with the glass cellar jobs that women are 'blocked' (translated: choose not to do because they don't want) from doing? Or perhaps you might also be equally interested in the lace curtain, part of the maternal gatekeeping issue that many men - self included - have encountered? Or, do you think ONLY women's issues needs addressing? Because as someone with real equality in mind, as oppose the feminist view of equality, I'd like to see some issues being resolved for BOTH sexes, instead of just one. Sadly, feminism has confirmed it is not remotely interested in equality as it focuses exclusively on issues from a female perspective only and ignores or marginalizes issues that affect men. Note, as one example, how you read an article about men & misandry and talk only about women.

Quote from Unregistered

Also, if children are exposed to media where women manage everything, women are then expected to do everything. Girls are then pressured into being able to juggle raising the children, being the breadwinner and still having enough time to be a "wonderful cook".

Which would you honestly prefer, to have your sex viewed as superior & capable - or clumsy and useless, only fit for derogatory mocking? I'm sure I know which one I'd prefer to be viewed as...

Quote from Unregistered

The two way street of respect that used to exist? Women didn't get the vote until 50 years ago!

LMFAO that's hilarious!

Quote from Unregistered

I might have believed you if you said 'two-way street which existed temporarily between the modern women and men rights movements', but really! Just watch any 1950's commercial to see how females were treated.

And look at today's adverts/sit-coms to see how men and boys are treated - today - not yesteryear. Why live in the past? Or is the past the only real grievance you can refer to?

Quote from Unregistered

Concerning spousal abuse: yes, it is fairly mutual, however, " many studies show that women suffer greater rates of injury due to domestic violence, and some studies show that women suffer higher rates of assault". Another statistic states that "estimates show that 248 of every 1,000 females and 76 of every 1,000 males are victims of physical assault and/or rape committed by their spouses"

When rape is included, it obviously skews the statistics. If rape were counted seperately the numbers would obviously be very different. Most men do not batter women, most women do not batter men - but according to feminist indoctrination, all men are out to abuse & rape every other woman on the planet. How hateful a person must be to actually spread such sickening mentality unto others.

Quote from Unregistered

The VAWA was passed because overall there IS a higher rate of abuse directed towards women! And if men are concerned about male victim spousal abuse, there's is nothing stopping them from passing their own act.

All such crimes were already illegal. VAWA implies that women are more important and men are less important. Why would a group pretending to seek equality outright demand that violence against one sex be treated harsher than the other group? Clearly, it promotes sexism.

Quote from Unregistered

Women earn 70% of what men earn.

Women who earn 70% tend to only do 70% of the work that men earning 100% do. Taking holidays, sick time and so forth isn't men's fault. Instead of - yet again - pointing the finger of blame at men, try pushing women to work harder if they're not getting the same pay. One of my colleagues earns a lot more than I do - for the same job. He, however, starts at 8am whereas I would start at 10am. Is it discrimination that I opted to start later in the day or is it my own doing? Exactly - but in the mind of a feminist, it's so much easier to simply blame men - even for women's own choices.

Quote from Unregistered

Girls younger than 13 are regularly sold into sex trades.

So are boys - why pretend it's a one way street?

Quote from Unregistered

Please note that I don't hate men. I simply want equality, and I don't feel you're adequately representing all the facts.

And to blame only men for everything, as evidenced by your post.

Quote from Unregistered

It's fine if this page is against misandry(which I agree is wrong in any society), but don't let yourself over-react and attack women just trying to stand up for their own rights and an equal society.

No one is attacking 'women'...

You see, here's a big difference. When feminists were fighting for such things as the right to vote and so on, many men and men's groups supported them; marched in the streets with them and wrote letters and gave supplies to help the cause. When men ask for equality in an area, women's groups either deny that men should have equality, fight against it or simply turn a blind eye to it.

You are being very kind to it marx.. Your patience is admirable!

Quote from haahoo

You are being very kind to it marx.. Your patience is admirable!

no doubt...

f'n trolls who hide behind anonyminity- i still have a hard time believeing there are these kind of ppl in this world

i am not sure why it does not register and debate it's concerns-this isn't a feminist web-site where it's posts will automatically be deleted when u don't agree with their agenda

bring your "feelings" along for the ride

I'm still cracking up about the 50year claim... that just demonstrates the level of lies, stupidity and ignorance feminists rely on so heavily.

feminists come in two flavours, the "clever ones" who use the idiotology to advance their own personal agenda for controlling everyone (usually because they have no kiids to control, having killed them all). The there are the "victims" of feminism, who dont even realise it, but they actually think it benefits them..

Well, they are just, dumb!!

Then again, most folk are not exactly alfred ironstien are they?

since they have had the vote for 50 years, and they make up the majority of voters anyway, everthing that has been bad for women in the last 50 years is surely the responsibility of the feminists isnt it?

The worst thing feminists do to women, is piss off blokes who women rely on!

Quote from Unregistered but annoyed.

Women didn't get the vote until 50 years ago!

50 years ago eh? Try 141 years ago! Making poorly researched flippant remarks doesn't lend credence to the rest of what you write (which is equally riddled with factual inconsistencies).

Woman Suffrage Timeline International - Winning the Vote Around the World
The first voting rights for British women began back in 1869. Remember, men couldn't vote for hundreds of years either, only but a tiny elite of men and women could.

Also, in many countries women received the vote just a few years after men (just 2 years in New Zealand). Men only got the vote first in many western countries because it was an effort by governments as WW1 was looming to appease the growing power of unions, and secondly to act as both an incentive and reward for those men to fight in the great war (something funnily enough women didn't want equality in, but instead many participated in the White Feather campaign by shaming men into fighting).

Furthermore, the greatest hinderance to British women securing suffrage was the suffragettes themselves.
http://antimisandry.com/chit-chat-ma...tml#post210851

A lot of women, especially feminists, seem to be of the deluded belief that all men had voting rights from the inception of parliament and that all men were involved in a vast conspiracy to keep women out. It really does not take that much effort to get a clearer picture of the realities of suffrage, as demonstrated by C.D's links which also lead to other useful links, even a quick search on wiki turns up some interesting stuff :



Suffrage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reform Act 1832 - extended voting rights to adult males who rented propertied land of a certain value, so allowing 1 in 7 males in the UK voting rights
Representation of the People Act 1884 - amended the Reform Act of 1867 so that it would apply equally to the countryside; this brought the voting population to 5,500,000, although 40% of males were still disenfranchised
Representation of the People Act 1918 - the consequences of World War I persuaded the government to expand the right to vote, not only for the many men who fought in the war who were disenfranchised, but also for the women who helped in the factories and elsewhere as part of the war effort. Property restrictions for voting were lifted for men, who could vote at 21; however women's votes were given with these property restrictions, and were limited to those over 30 years old. This raised the electorate from 7.7 million to 21.4 million with women making up 40% of the electorate.

this gives a better perspective than an ignorant “women weren't allowed to vote wha wha wha ”


not that there was much point in writing this as unregistered was probably just a petulant hit an run ...... but hey i aint got much on today

Quote from haahoo

...everthing that has been bad for women in the last 50 years is surely the responsibility of the feminists isnt it?

You're forgetting a simple fact here, HH... Women are never, ever respsonsible for anything, ever. Our unregistered feminist friend has pretty much confirmed that for us - as do most feminist folks. In short, if something is wrong - it's a man's fault. If something is wonderful - it is with thanks to women tho men are probably taking credit for it even though it couldn't have happened without a woman's input.

Simple, see.