I am interested in this subject as I feel men are being mistreated more and more within technical groups (my example: linux).
There are feminist's saying they are not welcomed and need to make their own websites or groups.
It seems the men running and moderating the sites fall down to peer/political pressure(?) and accept it as if they are scared of prosecution without realizing they are the ones being attacked + blamed without reason.
All the views are based on their propaganda of supposed research but when asked to provide examples of why or how this applies to the subject they cannot.

The main article I write about is here:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=136184

The OP is a feminist, women have posted on the site saying they disagree with her ideals but it doesn't seem to change the male moderators views.

I only read the first page.. and dear me, what a bunch of sour grapes.

Apparently, women's own notions that computers are boring is now 'systematic oppression keeping women out of technical fields'.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic....60791#p1060791

I find it funny that Feminists demand that men create their own space then denounce them for "excluding" women. What does linux have to do with gender anyway?

Hypocrisy and more article tear-downs.... - Blogs - antimisandry.com

feminist hypocrisy, surely not?

Quote from warren

because a man has to do everything, he has to do ALL the courting and approaching (unless he's a Brad Pitt or something), he has to meet a ton of superficial expectations before a woman will even give him the time of day.

That's somewhat disingenuous. After all, women usually have to meet superficial expectations as well. And I don't necessarily have a problem with that. But I'm not sure why it's considered wrong for a woman to only be interested in being in a relationship with someone she actually finds appealing. We're all autonomous beings, and, male or female, we don't exist solely to placate the ego of another person.

Quote from Cyhiraeth

That's somewhat disingenuous. After all, women usually have to meet superficial expectations as well. And I don't necessarily have a problem with that. But I'm not sure why it's considered wrong for a woman to only be interested in being in a relationship with someone she actually finds appealing. We're all autonomous beings, and, male or female, we don't exist solely to placate the ego of another person.

Warren didn't say this is what MRA's support, he simply observed this is currently how society is. No one, to my knowledge, said it is wrong that a woman might want a relationship with a man was wrong.

Quote from Unregistered

Um, could we please have referrences to these 130 studies you have cited that state "men and women are equally violent towards one another"...or at least clarify what you mean by 'violence'? Violence, I am lead to understand, is not always physical, and not clarifying this point could lead a reader to conclude that men and women are violence in the same ways.

You're clearly a misandrist. Women are abusive all over the place, all the time, including via physical violence. Get your head out of your ass and look around. Women are actually much more abusive, on average, then men, especially in the realm of violence, because men get into serious trouble for it, even if they are only defending themselves or other victims, while women usually get away without even a slap on the wrist.

I am not a man, and I do not hate women. I LOVE BEING A WOMAN. But, I hold no love or sympathy for psychopaths. These women are psychopaths, and no better than their male counterparts. They DESERVE to be with psychopathic, abusive men, because THEY'RE psychopathic, abusive women. But, oh, no. These he-she things prefer nice guys, because nice guys are easy prey. And, some of them like going after really awesome guys, for the challenge of breaking down an alpha. These women actively rape and abuse men... And, even other women. Such as when they try to convert other women to misandry, or when they try to destroy better women's lives to eliminate people they can't compete with. These women are 100% the same as the evil few men they dare to try and tell us ALL men are like, despite that they themselves are not dating men like that, they themselves go out and get good guys... Which they utterly destroy, breaking their will, so they will bow down and agree that men are inherently evil, despite they are personally not evil men. I have zero tolerance for "feminists," who funny enough, literally lack in estrogen and the feminism it naturally causes. They are not loving, nurturing, protective, or etc. Their hormones are screwed up.

Posted by Unregistered

Um, could we please have referrences to these 130 studies you have cited that state "men and women are equally violent towards one another"...or at least clarify what you mean by 'violence'? Violence, I am lead to understand, is not always physical, and not clarifying this point could lead a reader to conclude that men and women are violence in the same ways.

I can raise those 130 studies to 564.

REFERENCES EXAMINING ASSAULTS BY WOMEN ON THEIR SPOUSES OR MALE PARTNERS: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800.

This website should be called misogyny.com

Quote from Unregistered

This website should be called misogyny.com

What a wonderful argument you have put forward, clearly a true & pure mind to be reckoned with.


So, moving on....

Quote from Marx

What a wonderful argument you have put forward, clearly a true & pure mind to be reckoned with.


So, moving on....

MISOGYNY <-- actually exists

Quote from Unregistered

This website should be called misogyny.com

Please expand upon why you believe it to be so (with reasonable substantiation), and I'll be happy to engage in a healthy debate in systematically refuting your distorted premise.

1. I think nasty anti-female posts hurt men. It gives the misandrists ammunition, when they claim all men's rights people are all about hating women. People DO have the idea of extreme feminists, but feminism as been able to portray ALL men's rights people as extreme, and full of hate. So, they don't have to listen to anything we say. Of course, it doesn't help that we all support feminist propaganda with our tax dollars, in the guise of women's studies at most state universities and schools.

2. What does drive me to misogyny is that women are so powerful. They're pretty much able to get away with whatever anti-male activity they choose, because we've all been well-indoctrinated to the notion that women are goddesses, and men, shady, at best. Oh, yes, and that sexism is ONLY something men to do women. So, we don't start out on a level playing field, and most of us are out, shouting into the gale, for all the good it does.

Feminists will never listen to anything anyone says, unless they're nodding in agreement. If you think you can make a difference by gently rationalizing with them, go ahead. But speaking as someone who has tried that, I can tell you that you're wasting your time.

I can understand what you're saying, to an extent, but it clearly isn't working. Fuck the niceties.