An easy form of direct action today is to keep bombarding You Tube with this ;http://www.youtube.com/results?featu...rch_type=&aq=f

It would be great to see this as a perminant "Films being viewed NOW!


Oh and if you are not convinced heres my Dad again, 56,000 of his colleuges and more of the USAF perished to give us the freedom of speached we need to express TODAY!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzCFagp-7EM"]YouTube - 16 Avro Lancasters tour US July 1946[/ame]


Come on US and Canada where is your mission stsatement

Daveyone, what is the point of this sudden scattergun approach?

Tabbing on the end of every thread with your request that folk do what you suggest is more likely to piss folk off than anything else..

No one is going to just drop everything and jump to your calls for action just to make you feel better!!

Your "demands" seem interesting, I would say "good attempt", but when you are saying what "we" demand, don't you mean it is what YOU demand?

Who are you working with? Where is your focal point? Site/blog etc..

There is/was an activist group here, but when it came to it, no-one could be arsed, (and that included yourself) in doing even the basics of what they had agreed to do!

Haahoo, I have been deliberating over your comments for a while and regret any offence I have obviously caused you.
Not sure by scatter gun approach as having read much of what is here and elsewhere the mood seemed right to try to focus attention on the common ground there is here and that valiable resource could be put to good use if we all rallied to the respective protests when called upon to do so at Gateway, but if there was a constant push on all the media outlets with whatever time people are able to do the " Diy Kit "I have shown shows the range of people I will contact which if I have a single message I can sent to over 200 destinations in about an hour.

As for demand, the demand is on the 'Authorities' that play with peoples lives where as on here I am inviting people to participate in something I thought the cause of this site stood for! On a US thread I have asked if they care to view a thread, it is then left for others to decide and my experience of blogging for the past 5 years people don't get pissed off they either ignore it if of no interest or respond otherwise!
As for not being 'asked' not sure which item you refer to but an example I will give you is Simon Anderton I wrote to every main newspaper (Daily Mail said they could not deal with a case before it happened) wrote to all the newspapers in the North East called Radio Newcastle tried but failed at Tyne Tees but wrote to the judge and succeeded!!

(Who are you working with? Where is your focal point? Site/blog etc..)
all I can say is watch this space but whilst thinking about this and roaming my usual haunts I can across this;
http://www.freekareem.org/about/
here:
http://order-order.com/

Food for thought I am not a number, I am a free speech!

You havent caused me any offence, not at all.. It is good to see action and the will to get stuck in, my concerns are that this effort is like so many other "calls for action" in that it is borne of one mans situation and his desire to rally others.. One of several well-intentioned "flashes in the pan" that periodically comes up..

Which is good, but the history of the fathers movement shows that folk are only involved in the main for the short duration that they personally have an issue with the system..

I have been to the recent court cases of which you speak and it is a shame that such things have happened..

Sustained efforts of a few folk would be good and if you can generate a following, then better, but the old campaigns did not work and that type of activism is 5 years out of date now..

A new approach is needed, something perhaps subtler than the old way, and definately not something that gives an inch to the feminists or the court gravy train feeders.. We definately need to steer fathers away from groups like fnf who merely seek to create better victims and without doubt have folk in them who make a living off the system in pretty much the same way as the lawyers do.. State funded fathers groups are rewarded for being passive and inneffective lap dogs that toe the feminist PC line.. They dont know the first thing about what being a father is from what I have noted!!

Carry on with your campaign and call for action by all means, and I hope you get good support, but be aware that you need to present your case well, stay focused and stay committed to it for a sustained period..

In the meantime, I am involved with some "groundwork" that will hopefully be able to form a basis for improved effectiveness for future leaders for "the cause"..

Keep your eyes and ears open, you may find something that will help!

Just a note on Esther Rantzen as a figure head, don't know if this already been mentioned but she has a been a vociferous critic of the F4j movement in the uk, here is one article I remember from the Daily mail, it's in the google cache as pay per view http://news.google.co.uk/archivesear...n+earth&cf=all

"Fathers. also fight for their children. David Blunkett has notoriously sacrificed his own career in his battle for his son. Fathers4Justice, with their flamboyant protests, prove how passionately a father can feel the pain of losing access to his children and how obsessively he can pursue his rights. But this is a very different emotion from a mother's love. However noble the fathers' cause may be, there is sometimes a possessiveness about their love."



Mother love, the strongest force on earth

by Esther Rantzen
Daily Mail
Tuesday 4th January 2005

Through times of horror, we must cling to whatever symbols of hope we can find. And yesterday, amid the wreckage of so many shattered lives in South-East Asia, came one such tiny glimmer of good news.

None of us who had seen that astonishing picture of a young woman rushing down a Thai beach to save her children from the encroaching might of the tsunami could have imagined that she would survive.

But yesterday, despite all the odds, we learned that not only had Karin Svärd been found alive, but that her whole family had survived the onslaught and are now safely back home in Sweden.

We must pray that there will be other miracles like this in the days ahead. But in the meantime, that picture serves as a timely reminder that there is no more ferocious, selfless, all-consuming instinct than the love that drove Karin Svärd, facing almost certain death, into the sea - a mother's love for her children.

Mother love is not fashionable these days. We live in unsentimental times when the very idea is out of style. Women are leading tough, fulfilling lives outside the home, and many working mothers have to spend a great deal of time nurturing their strenuous careers, rather than their children.

Today's women are encouraged to delegate their mothering. Modern working mums convince themselves, as I did, that they are dispensable and replaceable in their children's lives.

And it's true - in most cases the children survive well without us next to them day and night. But when our children's lives are at stake, no one else will do. We mothers run to protect them whether literally or metaphorically. And no one should underestimate the almost superhuman force that compels us to protect our young.

When my first baby, Emily, was a few months old, my husband and I were persuaded to take a spring holiday in Greece without her.

We were both exhausted and we had a clever, well-trained nanny to look after our daughter. So we went, although I rang home every day to check she was all right, and the news was always good. Then one day, for no reason, I told my husband I wanted to go home.

It was crazy to give up a precious holiday for no good reason. But he humoured me, and we went to the local travel agent to try to book a return flight. It was Easter and there were no seats available. So I convinced myself that I was being stupid.

Only when we arrived home four days later did I discover that the nanny had decided to keep the truth from me, that Emily bad been taken suddenly ill and she had been extremely worried for her.

I think that hundreds of miles away in a Greek village, I caught an echo from my baby in my own mind - I believe instinctively she called to me, and I heard her.

From that moment I have always believed that mothers have a special emotional bond with their children.

Fathers. also fight for their children. David Blunkett has notoriously sacrificed his own career in his battle for his son. Fathers4Justice, with their flamboyant protests, prove how passionately a father can feel the pain of losing access to his children and how obsessively he can pursue his rights.

But this is a very different emotion from a mother's love. However noble the fathers' cause may be, there is sometimes a possessiveness about their love. You feel that, for them, their child represents their own chance of immortality, a part of their ego that they refuse to give up.

But a mother's love drives her to make any sacrifice to protect her baby.

There are women who have been warned by their doctors that to continue with a difficult pregnancy would put their own lives in danger, and yet they still choose to have the baby because the alternative is too horrible to contemplate.

Equally, there are mothers whose supreme sacrifice is to give up their own children to keep them safe.

When King Solomon was asked to choose between two women who both claimed a baby as their own, he offered to cut the child in half. The real mother instantly sacrificed her right to the baby rather than endanger the child's life.

The savagery of World War II created many examples of the same heroism, of mothers who put their own lives at risk but managed to save their children.

Many German Jews, in particular, went to enormous lengths to smuggle their children away to an unknown fate in a foreign land, as they themselves selves were being rounded up for transportation to the death camps. Trainloads of these children arrived in Britain with just a label round their necks to identify them.

One child, whose parents died in Auschwitz, remembers how her mother kissed her goodbye, then gazed at the night sky and told her that each evening when the child looked up, she would see in the stars her mother still looking after her.

Today, as we watch the pictures of the devastation left by the tsunami, some of the most extraordinary, heartbreaking stories also come from the mothers - women who have somehow survived the vicious battering by the sea.

Now like weary pilgrims they go from hospital to hospital, looking for the babies who were torn out of their arms, refusing to give up the search while there is still a glimmer of hope.

As time goes by, it, becomes less and less likely that their babies will be found alive, yet their courage forces them on. And, as Karin Svärd's story proves, miracles can and do happen.

One young mother was reunited with a baby which had been carried three kilometres from the village where they lived. The joy on her face when she found him lit up the television screen - a precious moment plucked from all the horror.

This weekend I had to let go the delicate, fragile hand that had held me so firmly when I was a child. My mother, Katherine, passed away.

She fought against her final illness like a champion, and although her life was hanging by a tiny thread on her final night, she refused to go until I arrived at her bedside on Sunday morning.

She was breathing with huge effort when I got to her side. Not sure she could still hear me, I spoke to her, I stroked her forehead, and then, with a sigh, she left me.

She was a clever, funny woman, mischievous, loving, and fought like a tiger to defend my sister and me whenever she felt we were threatened, whatever the odds.

I owe her so much - a happy secure childhood, the example she set of service to the community and loyalty to our family, and much else.

Her love gave me confidence and courage when I needed it. She was tiny and frail at the end, but the love she felt for me and my sister was still overpoweringly strong.

I know if she had been a young woman on that beach, watching me play in the path of the tidal wave, she would have run to save me, uncaring of any danger,

In many ways I, too, owe my life to that most powerful of emotions, my mother's love. A love so powerful that nothing not even nature's awesome fury - can destroy it.

For me personally there is little to be gained and the reason campaigns flounder after a relatively short period of time is that childhood is that short so after a while it is also little point to go further with it and it is this the authoraties rely on then the next batch of yutzes entre court to be fleeced!
My very nature is so against injustice and unfairness and I could not believe the relentless injustecies I have experienced in Family Law and capped when having had enough of CSA demanding money I had no chance of offering I asked someone from their Plymouth office you are going to follow me to my grave what then The don't careless responce was "never mind (Daveyone) we will take it from your estate!" They have never seen a penny from me they never will!
I am commited for change in 5 years the only thing that has changed is Jack Straws wishy washy attempt to open up the courts only to be thwarted by the very judges it was designed to scrutinise. So I want to see a major shift from this perceived accepted norm and sooner rather then later so lets get OUR acts to gether and push forward to achieve much better for future generations and make it law that honourable stop Dads at the court door before they can demonstrate an ability to show a balance of justice truely in the 'best interest of children' not the current pretence based on fee earning!!

http://antimisandry.com/blogs/haahoo...i-have-had-90/

This is an idea that i think could form the first step to ONE way of dealing with the shite that is happening right now..

Quote from haahoo

http://antimisandry.com/blogs/haahoo...i-have-had-90/

This is an idea that i think could form the first step to ONE way of dealing with the shite that is happening right now..

Oh absolutly Haahoo, and I guess I have been saying very similar things when I said Solicitors and courts need to be boycotted by men as if you can't resolve your differences between each other no way will this happen when theses so called honerable folk get involved! Thier best interest in a childs welfare is a far cry from what the child wants.
If a court order worked as it should it should preserve a childs wished till the child is of an age when they can decide for themselves , so if this was enforced esp on babies or small children so the Dad waalways in the child's life at the age of 14 they will know the value of having a Dad before they go off into the big wide world.

CAFCASS (CAFARCE more like) should be disbanded NOW other social services should be out of the court process and courts rely on reports from schools and GPs as they would have a more intimate knowlage of the child and family rather then the snapshot view these bunch of do gooders have ( and perhaps they could concerntrate on preventing Baby P type stories, whilst their intervention at court order level only serves to prepare this kind of work for them in the future!)

Keep hitting those Geldof buttons;
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g9LCTf-60Y"]YouTube - Geldof On Fathers, Part 2a[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g9LCTf-60Y"]YouTube - Geldof On Fathers, Part 2a[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2jg5CwqN-s&feature=fvw"]YouTube - Sir Bob Geldof interview - Parkinson - BBC[/ame]

You may also be interested to know that Ann Widdecombe is on LBC from 10 am (BST) next week so feel this is a good venue to reminder of her apperance on the above You Tube I will also lodge a comment on her own site; thus http://www.annwiddecombemp.com/index.htm

yeah I know not very grown up is it?

As promised;
House of Commons 7th August 2009
London
SW1A 0AA

For the attention of Ann Widdecombe MP.

Dear Madam,

Re: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2jg5CwqN-s&feature=fvw"]YouTube - Sir Bob Geldof interview - Parkinson - BBC[/ame]
You may remember your appearance on the Parkinson show about 5 years ago along with Sir Bob Geldof, and would respectfully wish to bring you up to date with this campaign as I see it and without the need for the counter productive superhero protests although the message remains the same thus;
JUSTICE4CHILDREN

Reform of Family Law: Legal aid to be given to both separating parents to a maximum in the UK of £500 each and a single court appearance, this will focus the mind to an early resolution and deter endless litigation and stop legal professionals plundering the legal aid purse for mum whilst bankrupting Dad.

Social services to be removed from the court reporting process has it occurred to anyone that they actually perpetuate future work for themselves by the incompetence they offer in the Family Court arena? A judge should be empowered to call upon a family GP for medical history of a child and regular up dates there after also for school age children the schools should be able to report to court as they see the children often more then the parents so should be able to offer a more intimate insight then the snap shot reports from social workers who then leave their case file on their shelve leaving us to clear up their mess for years to come.
The 10 year old Blair love child 'CAFCASS' to be disbanded they do far more harm then good Social services should then be able to concentrate on child welfare rather then dabble in family Law which they are not competent to do! They should be encouraged to attain life skills such as raising a child to at least teenage years before they can preach to parents no matter how 'qualified' they think they are.

Where there are no previous records of domestic abuse the norm should be equal access to both parents although not so rigid as a Court order would impose but a more flexible approach by reasonable consent by both parents if this is not adhered to the offending parent has to pay for any future court involvement!

Parental Responsibility Law: this should be enforceable and BOTH parents whose name appears on the birth certificate are to be liable for the care and welfare of their child to a minimum of the age 16 or till that child ends full time education/ leaves home. That parent has a duty of care to ensure that their child is fed and clothed receives the best education they can arrange and in spite of the unfortunate human rights act is responsible even for the 'grey area' of early teen so if that child commits a crime they are too young to be charged for the parent faces paying the fine or even imprisonment if that is what the child would have got had they been adult. Again this should focus the mind on the seriousness of parenting and a good side effect could be that teenagers may think twice, if their child grows up to be a problem and any failure of this parental responsibility should be met with stiff penalties on BOTH parents.

CSA to disband (Yes I mean it) part of the original court is to agree a once and for all financial agreement in the form of a contract between both parents with an expected norm to allow the children to benefit as they would had their parents not separated any failure here by either parent (not solely dads responsibility) to result in the offending parent paying for further court action.

Vengeful mothers and feckless dads and parents who allow their children to come to harm through their negligence to feel the full force of the law including prison and the children to go to the next available family member (Foster care should be made the very last resort if no other family member exists) Extended family should also have this enforced upon them as this will give the original parents greater incentive to do the right thing!


I also believe there should be a committee made up of public figures who could lobby these ideas to include;
The Rt. Hon Ian Duncan-Smith MP, Ann Widdecombe Camilla Cavendish, John Hemming MP Shaun Bailey Erin Prizzey Dennis Skinner MP (For a balance of political view and good at getting messages across) other suggestions welcomed for this committee of family and social cohesion (what ever that means)!

For your information I am not aligned to any organisation just an individual Dad who has fallen foul of Family Law whilst trying to do my best for my children, and have since gone on to blog around the world as Daveyone (Think of me as the Guido Fawkes of Family Law) My own M.P. is fully aware of my position an has left no stone unturned at the Ministry of Justice but to no avail, and would respectfully request ,Madam, that you look with fresh eyes at the true failings here and not be clouded by the somewhat ill conceived but desperate protests of some in the past.
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/ann..._and_the_weald
http://www.gordonpoole.com/?artistID=1631

and don't forget you can lobby her all next week here;
http://radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.4948 and e-mail her thus http://www.lbc.co.uk/ann-widdecombe-11033

Good Luck Guys!

Who thinks this would make a good anthem for our cause
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cYYGiL7l3s"]YouTube - Lucas - The Way Life's Meant To Be[/ame]

Today I have sent this message;
Sir,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...ate--I-on.html
Re: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2jg5CwqN-s&feature=fvw"]YouTube - Sir Bob Geldof interview - Parkinson - BBC[/ame]
You may remember Ann's appearance on the Parkinson show about 5 years ago along with Sir Bob Geldof, and would respectfully wish to bring you up to date with this campaign as I see it and without the need for the counter productive superhero protests although the message remains the same thus;
JUSTICE4CHILDREN
Reform of Family Law: Legal aid to be given to both separating parents to a maximum in the UK of £500 each and a single court appearance, this will focus the mind to an early resolution and deter endless litigation and stop legal professionals plundering the legal aid purse for mum whilst bankrupting Dad.
Social services to be removed from the court reporting process has it occurred to anyone that they actually perpetuate future work for themselves by the incompetence they offer in the Family Court arena? A judge should be empowered to call upon a family GP for medical history of a child and regular up dates there after also for school age children the schools should be able to report to court as they see the children often more then the parents so should be able to offer a more intimate insight then the snap shot reports from social workers who then leave their case file on their shelve leaving us to clear up their mess for years to come.
The 10 year old Blair love child 'CAFCASS' to be disbanded they do far more harm then good Social services should then be able to concentrate on child welfare rather then dabble in family Law which they are not competent to do! They should be encouraged to attain life skills such as raising a child to at least teenage years before they can preach to parents no matter how 'qualified' they think they are.
Where there are no previous records of domestic abuse the norm should be equal access to both parents although not so rigid as a Court order would impose but a more flexible approach by reasonable consent by both parents if this is not adhered to the offending parent has to pay for any future court involvement!
Parental Responsibility Law: this should be enforceable and BOTH parents whose name appears on the birth certificate are to be liable for the care and welfare of their child to a minimum of the age 16 or till that child ends full time education/ leaves home. That parent has a duty of care to ensure that their child is fed and clothed receives the best education they can arrange and in spite of the unfortunate human rights act is responsible even for the 'grey area' of early teen so if that child commits a crime they are too young to be charged for the parent faces paying the fine or even imprisonment if that is what the child would have got had they been adult. Again this should focus the mind on the seriousness of parenting and a good side effect could be that teenagers may think twice, if their child grows up to be a problem and any failure of this parental responsibility should be met with stiff penalties on BOTH parents.
CSA to disband (Yes I mean it) part of the original court is to agree a once and for all financial agreement in the form of a contract between both parents with an expected norm to allow the children to benefit as they would had their parents not separated any failure here by either parent (not solely dads responsibility) to result in the offending parent paying for further court action.
Vengeful mothers and feckless dads and parents who allow their children to come to harm through their negligence to feel the full force of the law including prison and the children to go to the next available family member (Foster care should be made the very last resort if no other family member exists) Extended family should also have this enforced upon them as this will give the original parents greater incentive to do the right thing!

I also believe there should be a committee made up of public figures who could lobby these ideas to include;
The Rt. Hon Ian Duncan-Smith MP, Ann Widdecombe Camilla Cavendish, John Hemming MP Shaun Bailey Erin Prizzey Dennis Skinner MP (For a balance of political view and good at getting messages across) other suggestions welcomed for this committee of family and social cohesion (what ever that means)!

For your information I am not aligned to any organisation such as F4J just an individual Dad who has fallen foul of Family Law whilst trying to do my best for my children, and have since gone on to blog around the world as Daveyone (Think of me as the Guido Fawkes of Family Law) My own M.P. Charles Walker, is fully aware of my position an has left no stone unturned at the Ministry of Justice but to no avail, and would respectfully request that you look with fresh eyes at the true failings here and not be clouded by the somewhat ill conceived but desperate protests of some in the past.

Thank you for your time.

To the Monday schedule of this Radio Station (and that includes Clive Bull Sunday night show NOW!)
http://www.lbc.co.uk/lbc-973-fm-schedule-636

So if you want to get your message across in London over the next 24 hrs now is your chance!

Just as an aside issue what is your view on this?;
http://www.virginmedia.com/digital/f...ons.php?ssid=2

Oh and the same applies to the BBC London Station thus;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/programmes/schedules
http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/programm...les/2009/08/10

Toon is in the building fantastic!!



These are new to me anyone else had experience of this organisation?

I have been a life long supporter of the Royal Family with great admiration of Her Majesty the Queen who has served with devotion for 56 years, and whilst dissenters will point out that she has never to care about paying her rent or gas bills it is also true to say her enduring legacy is to have a positive effect on many people, and the phrase Commonwealth, which relates to former colonies of the Empire, also refers to a fundamental ethos, Common- Wealth, if applied to all parts of society would resolve so many of the ills we are encountering today! You never hear a politician use the term Commonwealth as they do not want us to have it!


In the context of what we are trying to achieve here we have a commonwealth of knowledge, all be it gleened from the negative set of experiences we have been made to endure and we have a common goal to put things right which, in addition to various routes I have proposed on adjacent sites, this is the one I believe fit best here both for activists in the UK , Countries under her majesties reign and beyond. President Obama and his wife showed great warmth toward our Monarch during the G20 visit so even those in the US, and in spite of the 4th of July may well see the logic of this proposal!
In the UK right now the highest court in the land presided over by the Law Lords (also accountable to our Queen) move from the stuffy echelons of the House of Lords to a newly modernised location of the Supreme court across the road;

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6738825.ece

They claim the new court will give greater access to the public seeking review of cases failed at local court, This for us go's nowhere near enough to resolve the systematic failure and prejudice incurred to the detriment of our children, our family and the
longer term effect this has on society as a whole! On the AM board I have proposed a judicial review of ..well the judiciary and believe we should be in on the ground and running as this court opens for business for the first time. My be we could ask that anti war protester who has camped out in parliament square to move along a little to Collage Green and put our sign up too and we could lobby her Majesty the queen to propose a judicial review of these courts in view of their previous failings now whilst the M.Ps are languishing in foreign climbs and our letters (which our constitutionally monarch is duty bound to do) are not just filled away for some bleary eyed civil servant to pass on to the least helpful employee at the Ministry of Justice! I suggest we also send our letters Cc to a substantial newspapers such as The Telegraph or The Times and the shear volume it is hope would justify a notation in their hallowed covers!
I propose two type of letter one for UK residence to site our wishes for the new supreme court and the second for everywhere else in the world who's citizens have encountered the wrath of and erroneous Family Court Judge! Please and as has been stressed to me upon entering this site lets keep it all professional and write to Her majesty with respect I have a guide on how to address the Queen both from the UK and abroad there is a difference.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/
http://www.thecommonwealth.org/
http://www.wikihow.com/Write-to-HM-Queen-Elizabeth-II
http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Qu...ofJustice.aspx

For the UK;


Her Majesty the Queen 14th August 2009
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA
United Kingdom

Madam,

Re: Commonwealth a common goal!

I write to your Majesty on a matter of a serious nature that affects many thousands of children and families in the UK and countless more throughout the world.

Many Children are forcefully, but often wrongly separated from their parents as a result of ill informed Family Court Judgements, which are relevant too heavily on spurious reports from the Social Services.
The resulting disorder for that child and the family involved is most evident later when the child often neglected the supervision and guidance of a father is often found to be anti social and against the moral authority of schools and ultimately the police.

At this time when the Law Lords relocate to the new Supreme Court designed to give the public opportunity to appeal these failed judgements I am of the belief it is the time when the moral of this law is re-examined to enable children to have right of access to each and both of their parents, where it is safe to do so, and the prejudices that have blighted this law be stopped forthwith.

The social service and the damaging CAFCASS to be prevented from reporting to court and for family doctors (GPs) and indeed the schools to be called upon to report on the child’s welfare as they have a clearer insight and more intimate relationship then social workers who make random snap shot inspections, they should concentrate on Child Welfare rather then tote for business by contributing to the problems in the Family Court.

The time has come for a levelling of the playing field so a child has equal access to both parents’ and for those parents to exercise their obligations under their parental responsibilitie’s and state intervention to be encouraged to contribute to this end rather then perpetuate the problems as they do presently.

I hope Your Majesty is able to consider these proposals and pass that view on to those who can make a difference to a child, a parent and society as a whole.

I have the honour to remain, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servant.


Daveyone.