Thread: Mother Castrates 3-Month Old Boy, Blames Dog

Lol, Love the avatar Diogenes. It is either chosen to provoke the attention of angry females (to give you something to complain about with angry females?) OR it is making a huge statement regarding the subhuman ignorance of (the general?) male ideal? Hah! I'm glad we both share (at least half) of the amusement, if that's the case. Well done!

Either way, I was merely passing by due to the news of a person mutilating their child's genitals. Absolutely alarming. I don't understand why this is somehow in an "anti-misandry" site.

I believe there is a foolish dogma regarding the mutilation of genitals (circumcision) that is just morbidly horrid (regardless of gender)-- and it has nothing to do with the hatred of man (more like the stupidity of them) but I digress. While I understand this woman had no intention of "circumcising" her child, I think there will always be a crazed human being here or there, so there's no need to behave as if it is a personal attack towards one gender. (Unless of course, you're saying men are strictly all about their penises and vice verse. Given that sort logic, it would have to apply both ways. Meaning, men would have no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia, etc.)

Either way, just thought I'd toss my own two cents out there after observing what I have. Human beings have the tendency of expressing themselves.

Quote from Goddess

Either way, I was merely passing by due to the news of a person mutilating their child's genitals. Absolutely alarming. I don't understand why this is somehow in an "anti-misandry" site.

I believe there is a foolish dogma regarding the mutilation of genitals (circumcision) that is just morbidly horrid (regardless of gender)-- and it has nothing to do with the hatred of man (more like the stupidity of them) but I digress. While I understand this woman had no intention of "circumcising" her child, I think there will always be a crazed human being here or there, so there's no need to behave as if it is a personal attack towards one gender. (Unless of course, you're saying men are strictly all about their penises and vice verse. Given that sort logic, it would have to apply both ways. Meaning, men would have no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia, etc.)

Either way, just thought I'd toss my own two cents out there after observing what I have. Human beings have the tendency of expressing themselves.

Hello!

One thing to observe though... Normal mutilation of a male is acceptable in western culture. It is also quite acceptable in society for women to assault men at a sexual level. Men cannot even 'stare' at a woman in a sexual manner without facing legal repercussions.

Quote from Goddess

Either way, I was merely passing by due to the news of a person mutilating their child's genitals. Absolutely alarming. I don't understand why this is somehow in an "anti-misandry" site.

A person? Very selectively ambiguous! Can you say MOTHER mutilating their child's genitals?

Aside from your rather telling choice of psuedonym, you've obviously failed to recognize that mutilating children's genitalia is almost exclusively carried out by females (mothers) on boys (and men!), hence antimisandry. When was the last time (apart from Jack the Ripper and a few selected historical loonies who were rightly executed) you heard of males sexually mutilating females? Even then there was not moral abandon (as now, with fashionable revelry with the announcement of one more severed penis!), but societal disgust what befell such fallen women and accompanying retribution.

This is absolutely disgusting.

She needs to be beaten and thrown in prison for life.

Quote from haute macabre

This is absolutely disgusting.

She needs to be beaten and thrown in prison for life.

Goodness no!

She's a woman. A man made her do it, obviously. Or perhaps it was the patriarchal system that somehow forced her to do this? Who knows.. but what we do know is that as a female, she is entitled to do as she wishes upon a male, and he shall have very little, if any, protection given to him.

Quote from Marx

She's a woman. A man made her do it, obviously. Or perhaps it was the patriarchal system that somehow forced her to do this....

OK - So Why the Crybaby Whining? If it is our collective fault as pigs of the patriarchy then we must 'Man Up' and take one in the shorts for the home team metaphor squad.

I do take exception to a couple of points however - A:/- Amputation is different from Castration, and Mutilation of a Males Normal Healthy Genitals is also sold under the pretense of 'sex change'.
Hence, if the mother claims that the child was Actually a Girl, only born with the wrong equipment (and wrong genes), we may have another landmark legal case on our hands, just ask Judges Walker in Sodom by the Sea (destroy marriage) and Phillips in San Diego (destroy the military) if you have any questions as to just how far off the cutting edge these pioneers are willing to take us all.

B:/- Calls for the Execution of someone who did Not Kill another are also overboard. The Death Penalty is only for the Taking of a Life, regardless of who the victim is.

Ohso.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire

Quote from Goddess

Lol, Love the avatar Diogenes. It is either chosen to provoke the attention of angry females (to give you something to complain about with angry females?) OR it is making a huge statement regarding the subhuman ignorance of (the general?) male ideal? Hah! I'm glad we both share (at least half) of the amusement, if that's the case. Well done!

Either way, I was merely passing by due to the news of a person mutilating their child's genitals. Absolutely alarming. I don't understand why this is somehow in an "anti-misandry" site.

I believe there is a foolish dogma regarding the mutilation of genitals (circumcision) that is just morbidly horrid (regardless of gender)-- and it has nothing to do with the hatred of man (more like the stupidity of them) but I digress. While I understand this woman had no intention of "circumcising" her child, I think there will always be a crazed human being here or there, so there's no need to behave as if it is a personal attack towards one gender. (Unless of course, you're saying men are strictly all about their penises and vice verse. Given that sort logic, it would have to apply both ways. Meaning, men would have no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia, etc.)

Either way, just thought I'd toss my own two cents out there after observing what I have. Human beings have the tendency of expressing themselves.

"nothing to do with the hatred of man (more like the stupidity of them)"
The stupidity of men? Unbelievable! I suppose you can't see why that's misandric?

You can't see why this is on an anti misandry site?
So why is the issue of rape always found on a feminist site?
This crime was a female to male act of sexual violence on a defenseless child who's life has been ruined.

You know what? There are people selling T shirts saying "I love Castration" and even more offensive logos. Why? Do you think "I love rape" t shirts would be sold? No and why not? Because feminist activism has prevented the crime of rape from being promoted but no-one has stood up and said that the crime of castration is just that - a crime. And a lot of feminists see L Bobbit as some kind of hero. That's like men having some serial rapist as a hero.

So yes. This crime report belongs on this site.

Quote from Goddess

Lol, Love the avatar Diogenes. It is either chosen to provoke the attention of angry females (to give you something to complain about with angry females?) OR it is making a huge statement regarding the subhuman ignorance of (the general?) male ideal? Hah! I'm glad we both share (at least half) of the amusement, if that's the case. Well done!

Either way, I was merely passing by due to the news of a person mutilating their child's genitals. Absolutely alarming. I don't understand why this is somehow in an "anti-misandry" site.

I believe there is a foolish dogma regarding the mutilation of genitals (circumcision) that is just morbidly horrid (regardless of gender)-- and it has nothing to do with the hatred of man (more like the stupidity of them) but I digress. While I understand this woman had no intention of "circumcising" her child, I think there will always be a crazed human being here or there, so there's no need to behave as if it is a personal attack towards one gender. (Unless of course, you're saying men are strictly all about their penises and vice verse. Given that sort logic, it would have to apply both ways. Meaning, men would have no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia, etc.)

Either way, just thought I'd toss my own two cents out there after observing what I have. Human beings have the tendency of expressing themselves.

I think there will always be a crazed human being here or there, so there's no need to behave as if it is a personal attack towards one gender.

Really? This is not a medical procedure peaches...this is a blatant attack towards a child's gender. Castration, not circumcision. Do you think before you comment or just blather about at the nearest keyboard?

(Unless of course, you're saying men are strictly all about their penises and vice verse.

We are kind of attached. If mommy decides to cut it off it tends to sting a bit. It was never "strictly about" our penis. It's "strictly" about us not wanting them cut off.

Given that sort logic, it would have to apply both ways. Meaning, men would have no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia, etc.)

You have no understanding of logic. This comment is not only illogical it doesn't make a point, valid or otherwise. What logic have you described that promotes the conclusion of men having no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia? What is the "etc." for?

Either way, just thought I'd toss my own two cents out there after observing what I have. Human beings have the tendency of expressing themselves.

You've not observed anything. You've not contributed in the least other than a bit of entertainment. If anything I'd say your in the red about two pennies, and you've not "expressed" anything other than a bit of idiocy and a blatant misunderstanding of why it's NOT okie dokey to cut off a little boy's pecker.

If I were you and you were me I'd shoot myself in the foot and then go back to being me. You suck at life.

Quote from Bmiricle

Really? This is not a medical procedure peaches...this is a blatant attack towards a child's gender. Castration, not circumcision. Do you think before you comment or just blather about at the nearest keyboard?

We are kind of attached. If mommy decides to cut it off it tends to sting a bit. It was never "strictly about" our penis. It's "strictly" about us not wanting them cut off.

You have no understanding of logic. This comment is not only illogical it doesn't make a point, valid or otherwise. What logic have you described that promotes the conclusion of men having no business getting involved with anything that is of the female genitalia? What is the "etc." for?

You've not observed anything. You've not contributed in the least other than a bit of entertainment. If anything I'd say your in the red about two pennies, and you've not "expressed" anything other than a bit of idiocy and a blatant misunderstanding of why it's NOT okie dokey to cut off a little boy's pecker.

If I were you and you were me I'd shoot myself in the foot and then go back to being me. You suck at life.

Don't waste your time arguing with bridge trolls. Their lives suck so they pull this crap to stay busy. Only a narcissistic clown would call themselves a goddess even though they have no common sense nor knowledge.

"Don't waste your time arguing with bridge trolls. Their lives suck so they pull this crap to stay busy. Only a narcissistic clown would call themselves a goddess even though they have no common sense nor knowledge."

Damn! Beat me to it. Go Zube!

If I were you and you were me I'd shoot myself in the foot and then go back to being me. You suck at life.

I would add: "Like, totally."

"Mother Castrates 3-Month Old Boy, Blames Dog "

As long as it was a male dog, she'll get a pass.

TMOTS

Quote from Bratess

Lol, Love the avatar Diogenes. It is either chosen to provoke the attention of angry females (to give you something to complain about with angry females?) OR it is making a huge statement regarding the subhuman ignorance of (the general?) male ideal? Hah! I'm glad we both share (at least half) of the amusement, if that's the case. Well done!

Quote from Bratess

I think there will always be a crazed human being here or there, so there's no need to behave as if it is a personal attack towards one gender.

Two contrasting schools of reason, written by the same person, only four lines apart.

Yep, I smell feminism, in the air......

My my... so many responses just from a minor comment. Let's see...

Marx! Thanks a lot for your two cents, however, I'd like you to reconsider what is "acceptable" in the Western culture as "normal" when it comes to genital mutilation ("circumcision") -- have you actually SEEN a male child genitally mutilated?? It's horrific! Serves no health functions and is beyond revolting considering the child is not old enough to give consent -- I'm not even covering the fact that the child is *relying* upon his/her parents for safety -- whilst getting the complete opposite. (Check out some youtube videos that show the "medical" procedure taking place. Absolutely savage.)

Celtic Druid, yes that's right. "PERSON" as in, you don't have to be Mother for this to be horrendous.

"Aside from your rather telling choice of psuedonym" My username has nothing to do with anything except your own assumptions. That picture is more "telling" than a mere name. Let's not be so bias, shall we?

"you've obviously failed to recognize that mutilating children's genitalia is almost exclusively carried out by females (mothers) on boys (and men!)"

Truly? "Almost exclusively" you say? So, I'm wagering you think circumcision on males is totally alright? And if it's not, you're somehow claiming this was demanded by women? Heh, you are very misinformed. I don't even know what to think of your judgment after that.

Hello, UnicornMan. You said:

"The stupidity of men? Unbelievable! I suppose you can't see why that's misandric?"

Hmm, you seemed to have misconstrued my point to look like a personal attack against [your gender] in particular? Curious. You see, that sentence came from a preceding sentence discussing how the mutilation of genitals was *not* originated from a female mind, but from ancient primitive men trying to prevent boys from masturbating. (I had intended to say "men" as in "mankind" but I suppose your focusing on "gender" wouldn't be too far off since *technically* it was the men who made the rules... but again, that's digressing.)

"You can't see why this is on an anti misandry site?"

No, unless the mother somehow said "I always HATED MEN -- that child DESERVED IT!!!!" I don't understand why this is on a "misandry" site. It's almost as if you're associating penises with the entire existence of what it means to be a man. *shrug* But again, it's just my opinion.

"So why is the issue of rape always found on a feminist site?"

I have no idea. I'm not exactly an active member on feminist sites but I have met feminists and they don't exactly associate men [strictly] to their penises. I mean, if guys were all about their genitals, then all those heavy cases of little girls being molested by their fathers should somehow by (what?) misogynistic? So instead of the father just being some sick nut -- no. He's misogynistic, right? And anyone who disagrees (according to Byslexic Banana) is a "feminist" -- er .. I mean "male shouvanist." Correct?

Do you get my drift now why I don't see the connection? It's like ... if a nutcase is a MALE -- attacking a girl he's just a nut. But if the nutcase is *female* attacking a male -- she's into misandry? *shrug* Don't go all nazi on me for not agreeing that the logic doesn't hold water.

Nourishing more of your point, instead of assuming things, would be much appreciated!


"This crime was a female to male act of sexual violence on a defenseless child who's life has been ruined."

You know what? Nevermind, you just said it all.

"You know what? There are people selling T shirts saying "I love Castration" and even more offensive logos. Why? Do you think "I love rape" t shirts would be sold? No and why not? Because feminist activism has prevented the crime of rape from being promoted but no-one has stood up and said that the crime of castration is just that - a crime. And a lot of feminists see L Bobbit as some kind of hero. That's like men having some serial rapist as a hero."

Um, actually your statement is incorrect. There are a lot of people fighting against castration (myself included -- how do you think I stumbled upon this site?) The only problem is that the religion that supports it seems more popular than the knowledge against it itself. You seem to be focusing so negatively against the progress of feminists, instead of seeing and joining the communities doing something about our progress as the *human race.*

Quote from byslexic_danana

Two contrasting schools of reason, written by the same person, only four lines apart.

Yep, I smell feminism, in the air......

Interesting. Most feminists I've know have always backed up their materials with scholarly research and valid intellectual grounds. You're accusing me of being a feminist because I stated that there's no need to assume something is against your gender just because a crazed individual does something ... crazed?

The logic here is severely distorted. I quite stunned.

But then again, I just saw your signature, and I think I understand the mentality. Haha

Is this site against misandry or feminism? Because feminists aim to look for EQUALITY in the genders (for example, if a man sexually assaults/abuses his daughter -- would you call that misandry? If not then why the double standards?) I wouldn't consider it misogyny, but if you're sure...

Misandry on the other hand, laughs at feminists for supporting the ridiculous idea of being equal to your inferiors.

So, yeah. I'm a bit confused with where inspired jabbing is coming from. The situation is quite simple, really:

PSYCHO does something PSYCHOTIC. To me, it's all the same. They deserve punishment accordingly.
However, If psycho is male injuring female -- psycho is just psycho? (default)

If the genders are reversed, it's somehow "misandry"? Lol, come now!