She cut him one for her own protection. That's a laugh she admitted to calling over some men that brings the total to at least 9. But she needed to stab him for her own protection. 9to1 odds weren't good enough nope need to cut that foul male too. Feminists are so stupid I can't beleive that they garnered the power to themselves that they did.

I was unable to facilitate the link.

This sounds like a story I read about some time ago, whereby a similar number of frothing knuckle-dragging bull-dyke lesbians (undoubtedly feminists, and of the misandric variety) in San Francisco, CA, cowardly attacked a lone male based on a myriad of lame fem-provocation excuses. If it is the same case, has it not progressed or/and been resolved? If and when it is, I'd be very interested in the outcome.

It's amazing how the headline reads:

Man Describes Alleged Attack By 7 Lesbians In N.J.
Claims '06 Incident Was Hate Crime Against Straight Man

I wonder if a woman who had been attacked by 7 men would have the word 'alleged' in the headline. Somehow, I doubt.

For the benefit of those who the link doesn't work for, here is the article in full:

(CBS/AP) NEW YORK A man who was beaten and stabbed after a street fight with seven avowed lesbians testified Wednesday that he thought he was going to die after they jumped him last year.

"I remember being surrounded, my hands up in my face," Dwayne Buckle testified at the trial of four of the women. "I went up into a defensive position. I felt a nick in my abdomen. I had my two hands in front of my face."

He said he didn't realize he had been stabbed.

"Somebody told me I was stabbed," he said. "As soon as he said that, I felt it. I lay down on my knapsack. I was hollering and screaming. I felt like I was going to die."

Buckle, 29, said he was in a hospital for five days and in bed at his Queens home for a month after undergoing surgery for a lacerated liver and stomach. He said he also suffered cuts, bruises, scratches and an eye injury in the attack.

Buckle, who has called the incident "a hate crime against a straight man," was testifying in Manhattan's state Supreme Court at the trial of Patreese Johnson, 20, Renata Hill, 25, Venice Brown, 19, and Terrain Dandridge, 20, all of Newark, N.J.

The defendants are charged with first- and second-degree assault and gang assault. Johnson, accused of stabbing Buckle, also is charged with second-degree attempted murder. All have pleaded not guilty.

Three of the seven women pleaded guilty to assault charges in exchange for sentences of six months in jail and five years probation.

Buckle, a movie audio-video engineer and an independent filmmaker, said the fight started outside the Independent Film Center in lower Manhattan, where he was trying to sell videos he had made. He said that as the women walked by, he spoke to one of them because he found her attractive.

Buckle said a heavyset woman in the group said something rude.

"She just started dogging me out, being loud and disrespectful," he said. "I think I called her an elephant and told her I wasn't talking to her."

Buckle said she spoke disparagingly of his looks and clothing, saying he was wearing cheap sneakers. Meanwhile, another woman spat on him and he spat back.

The women surrounded and attacked Buckle, he said. After a few minutes, he said, the fight subsided and he began picking up his DVDs from the sidewalk.

"Someone attacked me from behind," Buckle said. "One girl called for some guys to come beat me up. A guy got me on the floor (sidewalk), and I was jumped again."

Assistant District Attorney Sharon Laveson told the jury in opening statements that surveillance video will show that Johnson pulled a steak knife from her purse and stabbed Buckle with it.

Johnson admits she slashed Buckle with a knife but says she did it in self-defense, according to papers filed by prosecutors at her arraignment. Johnson's statement says she pulled out her knife after Buckle grabbed her arm and spat on one of her friends.

"As I got my knife, Renata hit him for spitting," Johnson's statement says. "Then everyone jumped in because he is a man. Then some young men had helped us. After that we walked away. I admit I did cut him one time for my own safety."

(© 2007 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. )

One girl called for some guys to come beat me up. A guy got me on the floor (sidewalk), and I was jumped again."

This is typical isn't it? The other guys are helping THEM beat up and stab one of their own. This illustrates perfectly the essence of the problem.

Thanks for the article in full, Karl.

Seven avowed lesbians

Read: unashamedly, ideologically, fanatically, blindly, devoutly =feminists, thus intrinsically by definition -majoritively-man-haters and subsequently embracing a biased equilibrium of modern "filtrated and corrected" language which brands such proponents as misandrists)? God, what a concentrated bigoted deliberation of scathing misandry you'll be unlucky to fall upon, lest this concentration of man-hate that befell this poor chap - should happen upon the ideologically uniniatiated and unawakened elsewhere?

If we allow such glaringly repugnant, hatred-based "crimes" to be excused under the socially-acceptive and sickening sexist premise that "he was asking for it" compels justice itself to forever flip-flop jurisdiction based purely on gender and more so, feminist dogma, and thus justice and democracy in turn are negated by wholly contradictory divisive means of invasive self-serving ideological fragmenting components.

Hence, morality is subverted and evil is able to establish a beachead.

And in that day, seven women will grab hold of one man saying, 'we will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel, only let us be called by thy name to take away our reproach'". (Isaiah 4:1)

A mistake, it seems to have been a black man that was attacked. The article quotes the man's comment that she was fat, but not what they called him first with 7 voices. Maybe the N-word?

You should see on some other forums who this is flipped to being the man's fault!!!

What forums?

Quote from Timocrat

I'M GOING TO ALLOW THE ****INGLY OBVIOUS RESENTIVE TWATOIDS WHO HAVE THE AUDACITY TO ASSUMME THEIR PRESCENSE

Ok, seemingly innocuous. But where does one go to "patent" elaborations of entrenched rigid profanity. My point is, "twatoid," like twateratted, and cu*toid, like cu*teratted are a few examples of my own expressive and creative personal expressions I created/composed many years ago?

If creative language was franchised, I'd be rich!

Damn, as a kid I'd enthusiastically indulge in linguistic gymnastics as a enjoyable daily exercise.

Also, why is it I can compose the word prick, yet when I attempt to compose the word c*nt in any variation, I'm automatically censored by the software - on this ironically MRA board?

Why can't I say c*nt on this forum?

Ok, a preemptive retort, if c*nt is unacceptable, then prick as a logical "fair" expression must be equally as repugnant. Surely?

Quote from Celtic Druid

Ok, a preemptive retort, if c*nt is unacceptable, then prick as a logical "fair" expression must be equally as repugnant. Surely?

Hahaha, not so long ago I had an argument on MSN with my sister over the word 'c unt'.
She didn't like me using the word, I asked why and she told me that it wasn't a 'nice' word.
I pointed out that no-one seemed to have a problem with using less-than-pleasant words like 'cock' 'dick' or 'prick' to describe the equivalent male genitalia, so why should the use of the word '****' be so bad? Or was it just because it is women's genitalia being talked about in a less-than-pleasant way?
She then told me that I didn't 'understand' and disappeared offline.
Haha.
I won.

This definition on UrbanDictionary.com sums it up well:

For some reason this word really offends people, maybe because of the exceptionally crude sound of the word, or maybe because talking about the female genitalia is still considered unnaceptable. Either way, people cannot seem to comprehend that it is just a word, making it a great thing to say around tight ass pussies to piss them off.

I especially enjoy seeing feminists who talk about penises all day wince when I say ****. Makes me so giddy inside.

Being as both of the above postees with an issue about the censoring of one of only two single words have full access to the admin's section of the board, I would have thought that would be a more pertinent area to make your opinions heard.
However, that hasn't been the case - so I'll just say this. I personally do not see the need for vulgarities at any rate with only the rarest of exceptions. Because of the very lenient manner in which this board is overlooked, the vast majority of members respect the level of manners expected and adhere accordingly - more often than not intentionally misspelling the word to clarify their choice of profanity without having to spell it out completely, or employing similar tactics. That, to me, is a good thing.
Regardless, you're not the first to voice your opinions and so - I'll amend the filtering accordingly and remove the censor.

I really hope this board does not slide into a degenerate bath of vulgarities for no reason other than the 'right' to use them.