Greetings!! Is this your first visit? If so, please consider registering. It enables downloads and removal of adverts. Use the 'facebook connect' for quick access.
Register
+ Have your say...
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    212

    Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    .

    Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage Schools should be banned from promoting traditional marriage in sex education lessons for fear of discriminating against gay and lesbian children, academics claim.

    The biggest lecturers' union criticised teachers who champion heterosexual wedlock for instilling "negative images" of same-sex relationships.

    How long will it be, I wonder, before heterosexual men (and women) begin to make their voices heard above the persistent clamour from the left wing that is designed to undermine their own societies?

    Always remember that those with a 'socialist' disposition gain most of their power by causing disharmony within their societies. They profit hugely from disharmony. And undermining traditional marriage is, therefore, something that they will always attempt do.

    .

    More...

  2. #2
    Tyrael's Avatar
    Tyrael is offline Style & coordination Administration
    Member Since
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Western World
    Posts
    5,371

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Another nail in the coffin for birthrates. Most people are hetero and without them there wouldn't be any humans today. Without men there wouldn't be humanity (which is another male invention) and not the advanced society, technology of today.
    ~ Support Fathers & Families for Father's Rights and Equal Parenting! Go to fathersandfamilies.org ~

    ~ Fathers & FamiliesTM improves the lives of children and strengthens society by protecting the child’s right to the love and care of both parents after separation or divorce. ~

    ~ Feminism = Every bad thing any man has ever committed highlighted and exaggerated; every bit of good systematically undermined, vilified or ignored. ~

    ~ A man needs a woman like a lion needs a stove. ~

    ~ Women deserve only equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. ~

    ~ Men are not collectively "guilty" of anything. ~

    ~ Never needing to be pregnant is a blessing. ~

    ~ Feminist ideology “men have to respect women, but women have no reason to respect men” ~

    ~ Everybody makes choices, and nobody should be entitled to special treatment because of those choices.
    Equal results based on unequal treatment amounts to no kind of equality at all. ~

  3. #3
    Percy's Avatar
    Percy is online now Knackered old Knight
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Overlooking the D'Entrecasteaux Channel. The views are magnificent.
    Posts
    18,234

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Schools should be banned from promoting reading books in lessons for fear of discriminating against the illiterate. The illiterate make up at least 20% of society - which is a lot more than Homosexuals, whatever their sex, and teaching children to read simply gives tham big heads a false sense of importance. Writing too. No more of that. These little read and write snots will only write rude things about the illiterate. Just give the little buggers some crayons and tell'em to keep within the lines.

    Numbers is another thing. What gives with these teachers? Don't that understand that there are whole cities where people have to take their shoes and socks off tp count to twenty. Don't ask me how many, I only have two friggin' feet.

  4. #4
    Marx's Avatar
    Marx is offline Administrator
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    21,636
    My Blog Entries:
    67

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Well, on a positive note we guys can automatically count at least one digit higher than any woman... except those few women with abnormally large clits.
    The most offensive thing you can do to a feminist is treat her with FULL equality.
    --Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.--


    Antimisandry now offers it's members personal sub-forums
    (click here to register yours)


    ►A Decade of Investment in YOUR Future. ►AntiMisandry.com

  5. #5
    Marx's Avatar
    Marx is offline Administrator
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    21,636
    My Blog Entries:
    67

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    LoL, I can't believe I just lowered myself to that level in the above post... tsk.
    The most offensive thing you can do to a feminist is treat her with FULL equality.
    --Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.--


    Antimisandry now offers it's members personal sub-forums
    (click here to register yours)


    ►A Decade of Investment in YOUR Future. ►AntiMisandry.com

  6. #6
    bola's Avatar
    bola is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ghost Town
    Posts
    2,455

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Quote Quote from Drex View Post
    The mags, apart from detailing all the many ways that homo's maginificently partake in activities that seem to be designed to max the spread of diseases practically unknown in the non gay community, also go into to detail to explain how HIV infected individuals have some valid options when it comes to breeding..
    I don't share your resentment for homosexuals, although certain activists do get on my nerves, but the following scandal that came to light in The Netherlands this week does confirm your opinion on certain aspects of the gay culture.

    http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archive...fected_wit.php
    http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archive...ningen_hiv.php

  7. #7
    bachelor tom's Avatar
    bachelor tom is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,525

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Quote Quote from Drex View Post
    Maybe I am just jealous, like many hetros, that the average hetro can be lucky to have 15 sex partners in his life when the gays can easily rack up 500..

    Maybe the fact that us hetro's have to pay, pay, pay when we want sex and play the silly games, while the gays can keep hold of their money, dont have the expenses of kids, etc.. And find sex easily with true equals..

    I say, make your own choices, live and let live.. But I draw the line when they seek to groom kids and rubbish the hetro lifestyles..

    But, the homo's are forever complaining that they dont get a fair deal in society and need rights..
    Yeah, I get a little jealous too, it does seem easier for the homos to find partners, but then there's not that many of them

    My problem is that over 90% of the general population is hetero thus by definition 'normal', yet hetero sex and marriage are being redefined as 'deviant' - this is democracy?
    Feminism = Fear + Flattery

  8. #8
    bola's Avatar
    bola is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ghost Town
    Posts
    2,455

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Quote Quote from Drex View Post
    Het males are the most oppressed and put upon group in society today!!
    Yep. The lower class males are always the oppressed class, in any society. Past or present. That is never going to change.

  9. #9
    Male-Rights-Network's Avatar
    Male-Rights-Network is offline Long standing member
    Member Since
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Of course, "civil partnerships" seem on the face of them, quite ok..

    But, two factors..

    1. This arrangement is solely reserved for Homo's and lesbo's.. Completely denied for hetros!! This is blatant discrimination against breeders..

    2. The "civil partnership" while looking on paper like a harmless enough arrangement to allow for next of kin rights etc.. Is in reality paraded as "marraige", with the wedding ceremony and all, making a mockery of what real marraige is about..

    3. (I cant add up!) A gay marraige is a marraige of equals, a het marraige is a state institution now, designed to enslave men in sexless misery under a dominant and protected female.. Not by any means a marraige of equals!!

    No wonder the femi state will not allow the civil partnership.. they want to trap men in marital servitude..
    Is this true? Why is it that heterosexual couples cannot make use of civil partnerships, which seem to be rooted much more in the reality of intersexual relations rather than the grotesque Christian-Feminist hybrid that "matrimony" is?

    If the British Government can force a Catholic adoption agency to offer their services to gay couples against their policy; then surely the Government much be obliged to offer civil partnerships to all its citizens? Or even alter the entire "marriage" system if it doesn't work and abolish it.

    It's most ironic that the Marxofeminists running Britain at the the moment, Labour, are trying to remove all references to "marriage" and "husband" and "wife" in Government laws and publications, yet there are doing absolutely nothing to dissolve that institution at a civil law level.

    The reality is, of course, that marriage does work as far as Socialist Government and its Corporate interests are concerned. Takes money from the savers (men), gives it to the spenders (women). Boosts the consumer economy. Allows the single-parent system to work with reasonable success unlike in the Soviet system where it appeared first and did not work as the money and resources were not there. If it wasn't for men servicing the child support/alimony system the system would implode.

    At 50% of marriage failing in the UK (at a minimum, that figure is probably manipulated and the actual figure higher), it's clear that as an institution it is not working. It is not serving its stated purpose.

    It's also highly ironic that feminists in the '70s marched in the streets with the placards reading "DISAGGREGATION NOW" .. when marriage is essentially all about aggregation! If you are "aggregated" to someone else in the eyes of the law/Government, you are not independent, absolutely correct! Now that they have the power, why don't they get rid of it?

    Because, I suppose, you can pool the cash/assets, have them legally recognised them as "joint", divorce, and come away with the equivalent to a Lottery win in the €1,000,000s. Come away with something for absolutely nothing! Using your status as a "woman", "wife" and "mother" (and in all likelihood "victim") as bargaining chips. Systematic Wealth Transfer, that's all it is folks. Every woman/divorcee/wife knows it; it's the men who have not copped on to this reality.

    Chance of becoming a millionaire through the National Lottery: 1 in 8,145,060

    Chance of becoming a millionaire through Marriage-and-Divorce: 1 in 10 ??

    Certainly not much lower than 1 in 100, especially if you consider free, exorbitant income unrelated to a woman's actual needs but rather how wealthy the man is. Consider the 100% of the "family home" which you may not have paid 1 cent towards. Consider the imputed income for the 18 years of the child's life, and at the Court's arbitrary decision, well beyond that. It's free, tax-free dynamically expanding income. It's a fucking jackpot in the millions. And you must be female to play.

    Where else can you get such free, tax-free income. Certainly not through employment: you must earn it.

    Ah yes, the pervasiveness of greed. It's the one true Human Constant. The trick in a successful modern society is to give them enough opportunity to be motivated to acquire wealth and power, but not so much that their greed runs to infinity and impinges on the welfare of others.

    Given the opportunity, all people are greedy as fuck; they will take everything. Though the condition is considerably worse in females as the "need" more, e.g. materialistic goods such as cosmetic surgery, make-up, clothes, shoes all to impress "the girllzzz". Women are materialistic, self-centred narcissists. It all costs money you know, and if there's a possibility that it comes out of someone else's pocket (a man's), that possibility will be fully explored.

    Women's greed is endless, and Marriage-and-Divorce facilitates that greed. The State and the consumer economy all benefit in the transaction.

    Would the State ever change such a cozy situation, make marriage legal/unrecognised and make civil partnership the legal default?

    In all liklihood, no. And a lot of male wealth, power, influence and plain means for survival will disappear as a result.

    Always remember the golden rule: Whoever has the Gold, rules.

  10. #10
    Tyrael's Avatar
    Tyrael is offline Style & coordination Administration
    Member Since
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Western World
    Posts
    5,371

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    I'll repost here what I had posted in a other thread about this topic.

    Another nail in the coffin for birthrates. Most people are hetero and without them there wouldn't be any humans today. Without men there wouldn't be humanity (which is another male invention) and not the advanced society, technology of today.

    This is also a example of the lesbo-feminists agenda at work. First they try to kick out fathers and men in families then they legalize IVF for lesbian couples which is not in the best interest of children, because children deserve and also need a father, especially boys.

    Now they want to promote lesbianism in schools under the cloak of non-discrimination. However since when do we teach culture and such of a 2% (gays and lesbians) minority as if it's the culture and life style of the majority? It doesn't make any sense.

    There are i.e. Indian 1.8% and Pakistani 1.3% of the UK population in 2001. Are we teaching Indian and Pakistani life styles in schools as if it's the life style and culture of the majority? No, because it isn't and the same rule applies here as well in regards to sexuality.
    ~ Support Fathers & Families for Father's Rights and Equal Parenting! Go to fathersandfamilies.org ~

    ~ Fathers & FamiliesTM improves the lives of children and strengthens society by protecting the child’s right to the love and care of both parents after separation or divorce. ~

    ~ Feminism = Every bad thing any man has ever committed highlighted and exaggerated; every bit of good systematically undermined, vilified or ignored. ~

    ~ A man needs a woman like a lion needs a stove. ~

    ~ Women deserve only equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. ~

    ~ Men are not collectively "guilty" of anything. ~

    ~ Never needing to be pregnant is a blessing. ~

    ~ Feminist ideology “men have to respect women, but women have no reason to respect men” ~

    ~ Everybody makes choices, and nobody should be entitled to special treatment because of those choices.
    Equal results based on unequal treatment amounts to no kind of equality at all. ~

  11. #11
    Male-Rights-Network's Avatar
    Male-Rights-Network is offline Long standing member
    Member Since
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: Schools Should Not Promote Traditional Marriage

    Yes, the official reason given by the feminazi state as to why hetro's cant have a civil partnership is because they want hetros to get married, not have these partnerships..
    Hmm.... That's not really a reason though is it. "We are offering you marriage only because ... we want you to get married"

    I find it quite ridiculous, though unsurprising, that Britain would prevent heterosexual couples from setting up a civil partnership, and permit only homosexual couples to do so...


 

You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?

  1. Do traditional men
    By musicman.2 in forum Chit chat (MAIN)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21st-June-2009, 02:34 AM
  2. Terms of a Traditional Marriage
    By Adrian in forum Marriage/Divorce, Children, Choice for Men
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 1st-April-2009, 01:23 AM
  3. Traditional Duties
    By musicman.2 in forum Chit chat (MAIN)
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 14th-March-2009, 11:22 PM
  4. Replies: 93
    Last Post: 21st-May-2008, 10:07 PM
  5. A very traditional family!
    By IronLady in forum Chit chat (MAIN)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 4th-February-2008, 05:29 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Donate to AntiMisandry

1e2 Forum