It's about a university mangina that he has exposed.
You can watch it here



Check out the article http://media.www.theguardianonline.c...-2760753.shtml

Good find, Tyrael, and of course yet again a superb job by Mr. beefdog!

Two things I'd like to add tho':

First, the Mangina says:
You see, what he is really saying is (translation) : "Oh no, you're not getting away with it that easy! You have not worked even remotely enough to earn access to the precious vagina. You should put in a lot more effort before we allow you that. After all, we are talking about a precious vagina here."

Nevermind that a woman must allow it to happen - and if she allows it, and yes even if this happens on a first date - then why is the guy labeled "bastard"? Why? They obviously both wanted it, so why is this something automatically bad to want?

Anyway, he ends his article with

Ruin it? How will sex between two consensual adults ruin the night? Why is it always that sex (which of course only those dirty men want, but not women, no siree) is used as something that will take something away from the woman?

To sum it up, I think the Mangina should lay off the Danielle Steel stuff for a while, because like anything else, it's bad for one's health if used excessively.

This is typical. Feminists deny they are responsible for the desexualisation of males but it is obvious to any rational person. Then women wonder why they are finding the more feminised on average white man less and less attractive. This guy doesn't realise he has been conditioned by feminism and women's lib. This gentleman shit was never destroyed by feminism, why would they want to? Women generally go for the least feminised men.

Honestly I think women are of two minds on relationships the part of their mind that think says get a nice guy who you can walk all over! But the part of the mind that reacts to outside stimuli wants someone aggressive enough to protect them. I say that because no matter which type of man you are your woman will goad you to anger just to make sure you have at least a little agression. Agressive behavior is built into a man for a reason. Just as passive behavior is built into a woman. Hoe much we suppress this behavior is the question. I know this to be true from combat during Desert Storm the little guys or the guys that were abused in childhood were always the most aggressive in combat and the least likley to break down during combat. On the flipside however those of us who were aggressive were more likley to be wounded and suffer from ptsd as these are also the men who held honor faith and duty to be a soldiers most valuable traits.

I must admit that I often think about sleeping with women when I am on a date with them, but my experience is that women normally lead the 'bedroom boogie' as she calls it - they at least accept.

My concern with this article is that it actively tries to make women passive and fixes a man's character in one of two categories according to behaviour on (what is here) a one-night situation.

Men who sleep with women who want to be slept with are hardly bastards - more like gentlemen who appreciate the real needs of the modern woman. W

Women love sex - but this author seems to think that sex is only useful as a tactic! Oh dear