MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
This is a discussion on MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD within the Activism Knowledge anti misandry forums, part of the Campaigns & News category; MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD by Marc H. Rudov June 11, 2008 NewsWithViews.com The Defeatist Generation Tom Brokaw’s book, The ...
- 18th-June-2008 #1
MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
Link.MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
by Marc H. Rudov
June 11, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
The Defeatist Generation
Tom Brokaw’s book, The Greatest Generation, is filled with personal accounts of brave American soldiers who fought in World War II. Until Brokaw interviewed them, in their august years, they never had spoken to anyone of their wartime experiences, believing that feelings are better left undisturbed and unarticulated, that silence and masculinity are synonymous. Instead of teaching their sons to fight like hell and sacrifice for a great cause, these reluctant talkers inadvertently created a generation of passively silent men who pathetically march to the feminist agenda. Alas, these Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials are the men of The Defeatist Generation — willing to lay down their arms and surrender to the gynocratic army.
When the topic is Osama bin Laden, men are Rambo; when the topic is women, men are Bambi. Men will go bonkers over — and pay lots of cash to see — football, hockey, rock concerts, tractor pulls, boxing matches, and naked women. But, when elected officials legislate away their reproductive, civil, and custody rights, their rowdiness melds into reticence. These men of “action” are quickly transformed into passive, diffident, cheap wimps. If one of their friends gets falsely accused of rape, they will be shocked … for two seconds … and then hope like hell it never happens to them. End of story.
Like Tom Brokaw’s WWII heroes, men of The Defeatist Generation willingly suck up their pain, akin to the old circus guy taking a cannonball in the stomach. Unlike Brokaw’s war heroes, however, they win few gender wars because they rarely, if ever, fight back. Only defeatists subserviently wine & dine their girlfriends and wives for sex, and then see those same women gouge them in divorce court. Only defeatists continue to reelect and reelect Senator Joe Biden, the biggest man-hater in the US Senate, the father of VAWA — the inexplicably unconstitutional but thriving Violence Against Women Act.
On my radio show two weeks ago, I interviewed Michael Robinson, executive director of the California Alliance of Families and Children (CAFC). With an annual operating budget of $50K, Michael is the sole policy consultant for men’s rights in California. He competes with 25 feminist lobbyists, operating with $10M per year — outstaffed 25:1 and outspent 200:1. That’s why California, in 2008, still unconstitutionally defines DV as man hitting woman! Yet, he’s had some great legislative successes: preventing divorced mothers from unilaterally moving their children out of state, keeping parental alienation in the family-court lexicon, and putting a stop to some forms of paternity fraud.
Incredibly, if Michael Robinson quits his tireless policy-reform activities or becomes incapacitated, the men in California will have nobody to fight for them in Sacramento. They must find this alarming, right? Wrong. When I asked Robinson how much donation money he had received almost two weeks after appearing on my show, he answered: “Zero!” That’s right: men feel entitled to Michael Robinson’s hard work.
Survival of the Fittest
Money talks; bullshit walks. One must conclude, then, that the peripatetic men of the Golden State are so busy with bullshit, like playing fantasy football and paying their women for sex, that they can’t be bothered to worry about losing their rights. That’s why California is called the Golden State: men’s silence is women’s gold. Gynocratic politicians, and the male voters who elect them, enable women to mine the gold of maternity and paternity fraud, and false accusations of rape, DV, and sexual harassment.
Case in point: Senator Joe Biden wants to give women free access to 100K taxpayer-funded lawyers so they can falsely accuse men of DV and take their children away from them. Unconstitutionality aside, there are two psychological questions necessary here: 1) Why does Biden continue his angry rampage against men? 2) Why do the eunuchs of Delaware keep this A-hole in office?
Notwithstanding that “survival of the fittest” is an irrefutable axiom, known to every living creature on Planet Earth, men somehow contract amnesia and a death wish when women are present — their testicles experience real shrinkage. I see this every time a man pulls out a chair for his female competitor in the infamous boardroom on Donald Trump’s The Apprentice.
Passive silence is the signature characteristic of The Defeatist Generation. Just remember what happens to the proverbial frog sitting motionless in the pot of water over a low flame: as the water temperature slowly rises (akin to yet another misandrist law being passed), the frog incrementally approaches the point of death. Likewise, while men sit in silent oblivion, the determined feminists, aided by male politicians, incrementally crank up the legislative and judicial heat until these silent, oblivious men are dead in the water.
General Mills is currently running a misandrist Multi-Grain Cheerios commercial in which the husband, deathly afraid of his wife, informs her that the cereal has only 110 calories. She demands to know if he’s calling her fat. Then, he almost wets his pants and barely can look her in the eye, while apologetically explaining that he was merely reading the box’s nutrition matrix. “What else does the box say?” she gloweringly inquires. He sheepishly replies, “Shut up, Steve.” Finally, she shoots him a wan, condescending smirk of approval. I want to puke every time I see this trash. This eunuch is a typical cowering American male, a member of the Defeatist Generation. Why didn’t he just say to her, “Yeah, you have a fat ass!”?
Why did General Mills fund this commercial? Because its VP of marketing felt that diminishing a man in front of his wife would sell cereal, based on how most couples interact. The eunuch in this Cheerios commercial is a proxy for every man who grovels to his merchant maureen for sex, for every feminist-controlled gynocrat who’s so fearful of his wife that he willingly throws his male constituents under the bus.
The NoNonsense Bottom Line
Based on my experience in this business, men tend to blame their misandry predicament on women. That’s like getting drunk and wrapping your new car around a tree, and then blaming the alcohol.
The reality is, men must blame themselves for slowly giving away their rights over the past 50 years. They must stop behaving like cringing, passive, silent, cheap ostriches and become titans of action — before the indefatigable feminists, with their deep Louis Vuitton bags, completely gut men’s rights. Men cling to their remaining right — the right to remain silent — and have made it an artform, a self-defeating death wish.
Men make two key mistakes in life: they recruit merchant maureens and elect gynocrats. A merchant maureen is a woman who drops her anchor into a man’s wallet, with his consent. He is silent, out of desperation for sex, and willingly gives her his gold. Most men, whether in private life or politics, just don’t have the balls to stand up to merchant maureens.
A gynocrat is a politician who cares only about women’s rights — men are invisible and irrelevant. Can you name an American politician who isn’t a gynocrat? Didn’t think so. Yet, gynocrats hold — and keep — elected office because men, 44% of the electorate, put and keep them there. Accordingly, gynocrats care nothing about men because they have no evidence that men care about themselves.
Men will protest a bad referee call during the Super Bowl, but they won’t protest bad laws that strip them of their rights. Men will pay thousands of dollars to purchase widescreen TVs the week before the Super Bowl, but they won’t contribute $10 to a lobbyist fighting for their rights to live as protected citizens. What else would you expect from the Defeatist Generation?
Again, men make two key mistakes in life: they recruit merchant maureens and elect gynocrats. Very simply, then, here’s how they can self-correct: 1) don’t recruit merchant maureens and 2) don’t elect gynocrats.
The true measure of a man is the courage of his convictions, the degree to which he’ll fight for his rights. The bottom line is the bottom line: How much do you really want to keep your gold? Your deafening silence says it all.
© 2008 - Marc H. Rudov - All Rights Reserved
Yep he's right on the money.Men make two key mistakes in life: they recruit merchant maureens and elect gynocrats. A merchant maureen is a woman who drops her anchor into a man’s wallet, with his consent. He is silent, out of desperation for sex, and willingly gives her his gold. Most men, whether in private life or politics, just don’t have the balls to stand up to merchant maureens.
A gynocrat is a politician who cares only about women’s rights — men are invisible and irrelevant. Can you name an American politician who isn’t a gynocrat? Didn’t think so. Yet, gynocrats hold — and keep — elected office because men, 44% of the electorate, put and keep them there. Accordingly, gynocrats care nothing about men because they have no evidence that men care about themselves.
Men will protest a bad referee call during the Super Bowl, but they won’t protest bad laws that strip them of their rights. Men will pay thousands of dollars to purchase widescreen TVs the week before the Super Bowl, but they won’t contribute $10 to a lobbyist fighting for their rights to live as protected citizens. What else would you expect from the Defeatist Generation?
Again, men make two key mistakes in life: they recruit merchant maureens and elect gynocrats. Very simply, then, here’s how they can self-correct: 1) don’t recruit merchant maureens and 2) don’t elect gynocrats.
The true measure of a man is the courage of his convictions, the degree to which he’ll fight for his rights. The bottom line is the bottom line: How much do you really want to keep your gold? Your deafening silence says it all.Last edited by Tyrael; 18th-June-2008 at 08:40 PM.
~ Support Fathers & Families for Father's Rights and Equal Parenting! Go to fathersandfamilies.org ~
~ Fathers & FamiliesTM improves the lives of children and strengthens society by protecting the child’s right to the love and care of both parents after separation or divorce. ~
~ Feminism = Every bad thing any man has ever committed highlighted and exaggerated; every bit of good systematically undermined, vilified or ignored. ~
~ A man needs a woman like a lion needs a stove. ~
~ Women deserve only equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. ~
~ Men are not collectively "guilty" of anything. ~
~ Never needing to be pregnant is a blessing. ~
~ Feminist ideology “men have to respect women, but women have no reason to respect men” ~
~ Everybody makes choices, and nobody should be entitled to special treatment because of those choices.
Equal results based on unequal treatment amounts to no kind of equality at all. ~
- 18th-June-2008 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 18th-June-2008 #2
- Member Since
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Secret Location in an Underground Bunker
- Posts
- 1,588
- My Blog Entries:
- 1
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
Marc's best ever article! Finally I can warm to this lawyer. Super. A call to arms is what is needed from many quarters, and this is right on the buttton.
- 18th-June-2008 #3
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
$$$$Come get it bitch!$$$$
Washington knew he could win the battle of attrition against a tyrant, and so should we. It is a marathon, not a sprint.
This man is akin to a church in the middle of downtown Las Vegas.
California is definitely an evil woman.
- 18th-June-2008 #4
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
I can understand his frustration, but it's not that simple.
Avoid voting for gynocrats? I don't know anybody in our parliament who isn't a gynocrat, except maybe the members of a small fundamentalist protestant party (2 seats) who are opposed to democracy and want social order to be based on the scripture.
Not marry a mercenary, manipulative harpy? Maybe Rudov thinks everybody has as much choice as he has. Somebody's going to get stuck with them, and there are many.
Anyway, it seems Rudov is more and more taking to man bashing.
- 19th-June-2008 #5
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
It's an honest and simultaneously depressing article about how modern man has completely surrendered to a gynocentric hell, without any semblance of a fight. I've made similar points previously how men will fight tooth and nail in just about every other scenario that doesn't involve women. Here, they dare not muster a wimper. Truely pathetic!
As for gynocrats, yes most male politicians are too varying degrees. Whats the alternative? Given that most female politicians have feminist inclinations, a sinking realization is experienced given what a monumental task we face - in the void of any real tangible alternative. Whoever we vote for, it's only differing degrees of the same pathology.
Totally agreed. If you don't vigorously uphold such necessity of thought, your part of the problem.The true measure of a man is the courage of his convictions, the degree to which he’ll fight for his rights.Last edited by Celtic Druid; 19th-June-2008 at 12:29 AM.
The wicked flee when none pursueth. Proverbs 28:1
'Rise like Lions after slumber In unvanquishable number - Shake your chains to earth like dew Which in sleep had fallen on you - Ye are many - they are few.'
Percy Bysshe Shelley
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. "
Thomas Jefferson
The internet has been a lifeboat for men's opposition to the floodings of feminism.
Celtic Druid
-
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
He says that men have been stripping themselves of their rights. What rights have been taken away from men? (Please don't shoot me for asking this...it's not a challenge, it's a point of confusion for me.) What I see is that men AND women have been supporting legislation that gives privilege to women, benefits to women that go beyond equality and into the realm of entitlement.
It doesn't seem that men have lost rights, but it does seem that men are contributing to (but not solely responsible for!) the fact that women now have a privileged status.
-
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
So how do we realistically approach this? Do we need to remove the privileged status, take away the benefits that have led to entitlement, and enforce the equality that remains? Or, do we fight for men to have the same privileges, the same benefits, and the same entitlement that women have been enjoying and hold that as a measure of true equality?
My thoughts: we need to remove the privileged status, and enforce true equality in regard to our laws and practices.
How to go about doing that is another story altogether...
- 19th-June-2008 #8
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
The problem is tera, mens "rights" that have been "removed" where those rights that occur naturally, they did not need enforcing or writing down because they, just were!!
The best example is the male head of family.
That used to be presumed in marraige, yet clearly the laws have changed to make that no longer true.
I agree that stripping away female priviledges and rights is the way forward.
But, since the state has assumed family headship effectively, its a matter of getting the state to back out more than anything as women do also have natural rights that "just are".. Such as the natural right to get pregnant and breastfeed!
I agree. Men are their own worst enemies in allowing these things to happen.
Mainly because they will not fight to hold on against the state.
- 19th-June-2008 #9
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
TERA asks:
An intelligent person would look around and see the answers and I for one recommend that you do, TERA.He says that men have been stripping themselves of their rights. What rights have been taken away from men?
I will give you a starter: The right to me measured against a public standard of Truth.
Men are not afforded Truth anymore in public life or private. It has been strangled.
Women on the other hand have been afforded access to an unprecedented reverence for Lies. It is given to them to consume at will in academic smorgasbords by researchers who do not bother to wash their hands; by Judges who require the Truth, the Whole Truth and nothing but the Truth only to refuse to let it be spoken; by cops who wear ear defenders to drown the voice of Truth along with the hiss of their sprays and the thud of their truncheons; by mainstream media who make their living selling coverup, starting with the face of the Princess; by the Politicians that create power from female hysteria engines constructed in the dark cellars of the feminist soul.
From this imbalance comes the wobble that breaks the axle; that shaft that links women and men in harmony.
Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum
Love the Sinner but not the Sin.
(St. Augustine)
“ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers,
against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. “
(and within ourselves)
(Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
A Feminist is a human being who has lost her way and turned vicious.
If you meet one on the road as you Go your Own Way,
offer kindness but keep your sword drawn.
(Me)
-
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
The right of a man (as opposed to a woman or opposed to both men AND women together) to be the head of a household, was that ever a right or was it a privilege?
I suppose it was a right...way back when women could not vote nor own property and she was legally viewed as her husband's property.
I can't say I'd want to return to those times, even if you do. Though I agree the state of things today is that women now hold much more power than any other member of the common household, and that is not just, either.
Why can't both men and women be heads of their own households?
- 19th-June-2008 #11
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
Just assumed, the natural order.. But no doubt many men were happy to delagate it all away!
You cant have two heads really can you?
She was legally entitled to remain unmarried. She made her choice before witnesses.
I suppose it was a right...way back when women could not vote nor own property and she was legally viewed as her husband's property.
I have ideas. Something along the lines of prenups perhaps!I can't say I'd want to return to those times, even if you do. Though I agree the state of things today is that women now hold much more power than any other member of the common household, and that is not just, either.
They can, if they live seperately!Why can't both men and women be heads of their own households?
And thats what many do now.
Shame though that it has come to this?
- 19th-June-2008 #12
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
What about the right to be a parent Tera surely you can see that men have lost that right.
Or how about the right to innocence until proven guilty?
Or How about the right to the pursuit of happiness?
What rights have men lost? It is plainly evident what rights men have lost.
And these are just a few I could name more but I am too pissed to go on.Chevalier.
"no greater love hath a man than to lay down his life for his brother."
-
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
That's true, Chevalier. I do see that. When women are always given primary custody, men have lost their right to be parents. And this loss is huge, and yes, it would affect their right to be happy. And yes, in court, men really do seem to be presumed guilty.
Thank you for pointing these things out.
-
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
I thought of another one, Chev...
The right to compete fairly for a job (or for a college education).....affirmative action doesn't "level the playing field" it creates discrimination against white males.
- 19th-June-2008 #15
Re: MEN'S SILENCE IS WOMAN'S GOLD
What about the right to be able to have sex the way you like it?
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
'Breaking the Silence' remains unbroken!
By Fidelbogen in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double StandardsReplies: 1Last Post: 15th-August-2006, 11:18 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote








Bookmarks