The DV conference held last February in Sacramento had a couple representatives from Taiwan. I don't think this is a coincidence. This change in their laws is probably a direct result of that conference.

The reduction of tuition for children of such families and those with low income attending colleges or universities will be raised to 60 percent from the current 30 percent.

I have a problem with omnibus legislations that give incentives like this. It increases the liklihood of false allegation.

Correct percy. The whole DV industry is a statism promoting family-wrecking disgrace and is a method of encouraging the victim culture that creates state dependance by perverse incentivisation..

Decades after the work of Pizzey showed the true face of the industry, the MRM look to be heading down the same dumb road as a matter of policy..

Quote from haahoo

Correct percy. The whole DV industry is a statism promoting family-wrecking disgrace and is a method of encouraging the victim culture that creates state dependance by perverse incentivisation..

Decades after the work of Pizzey showed the true face of the industry, the MRM look to be heading down the same dumb road as a matter of policy..

Demanding equal treatment does not necessarily mean that the MRM in general wants to depend a lot on government support (which is funded by men for about 70%, yet less than half of the resources goes to men).

The proper recognition and equal treatment of male domestic violence victims in Taiwan is a great milestone that is reason for celebration.

Quote from Tyrael

The proper recognition and equal treatment of male domestic violence victims in Taiwan is a great milestone that is reason for celebration.

that's just because there's still some testosterone in Taiwan. The Govn't hasn't had time to be bullied and indoctrinated by these radical fembots we have in the UK, IRL and US/CA.

MRA have a lot of catching up to do in the West.

Creating perverse incentives for men to match the perverse incentives for women is no victory. 2 Wrongs dont make a right..

Folk who expect the state to solve their personal shit out usually have a not too hard to see hidden agenda..

Hand it to them as a carrot, and many folk will take it..

I really dont see the sense in providing DV victims prefferential treatment just because they are DV victims..

Sure the criteria could be on something a bit more universally applicable, such as income for example?

I really don't see the need for all this pessamism.

Of course dv shelters are massively overused by non victims, but that doesn't mean their aren't legitimate victims out there for whom these shelters are a fantastic thing.

DV is a fantastic area for exposing just how sexist and anti male most feminists and many governmetns are. It really is a great area for making feminist look very, very stupid.

This decision in Taiwan puts there massively ahead of us and should be celebrated wholehertedly.

Once shelters and support for men exists in significant amounts then most feminst are not only exposed as gender racists - it also means they have lost their argument and been caught lying.

The whole basis of all their theories about sexism, power and discrimination is fundamentally routed in the assumption that the male victims do not exist.

If we had polcies here such as in Taiwan (and they were sucessful) it would be such a massive blow for feminists - they would get so mad you wouldn't beleive it.

I was thinking, is Domestic Violence a feminist creation?