lol@$95 compensation.

Just by looking at those 3 skanks, it's obvious they were throwing some kind of rug-munching, man-hating party, and when a group of men walked by, they took their unjustified anger out on one of them.

What annoys me, is the fact that he didn't fight back, and his friends didn't help, not because they were afraid of the women, but because they were afraid of how society would have judged them for hitting a woman, even an attacking woman, it's disgraceful that women have this license to just go around hitting men whenever they get the whim.

Compare the sentences to those that 3 men would have received if they attacked a woman, it's just insulting to our intelligence, and insulting to justice and decency.

I tell you, I would have no qualms, absolutely no qualms whatsoever about putting those whores on their arse, shove true equality down their throats, and shove my foot up their arses, but that situation is unlikely to happen to me, because I don't look weak, I bet the man who was attacked did look weak, and I bet he was smaller than them as well.

During the attack the three women screamed: 'All men are stupid!'

It's not always the case, but whenever you encounter lesbians it's very rare there isn't some animosity through to raw hatred of men. And of course, feminism is predominantly synonymous with such a lifestyle.

Sounds like a hate crime also. I doubt very much the worst they said was 'All men are stupid.' Try replacing stupid with scum for starters.

The trio admitted assault and received three-month suspended jail terms.

The courts are basically saying their crimes are so insignificant it doesn't warrant a custodial sentence (reverse the genders?). A green light for all would-be misandric vigilantes to do the same.

Grimsby magistrate Mike Corry said: 'This was a totally unnecessary attack. You were like a pack of animals chasing its prey.

'There was some abuse in the first place but the action you took was completely over the top.'

The gutless magistrate contradicts himself, first he says that "'This was a totally unnecessary attack." Then he proceeds to wrongly concede their was some justification by saying "'There was some abuse in the first place." He's basically saying provocation is an acceptable excuse for these women's violence, hence the paltry sentence.

That so-called "abuse" was clearly shown to have been someone else. Furthermore, no woman has the right to physically assault any man just because he has wolf-whistled them. This is the sort of disproportionate response you'd expect from religious extremists when someone has "offended" their god (gynocentrism being the largest subscribed to faux religion).

It's just the sheer spoilt arrogance of women who are perpetually offended at everything, who think they have the right to be judge and jury.

Three bloodthirsty dykes beat down a man for a cheap thrill?

Too bad I wasn't their to lower the boom on all three of those carpet munching dogs!!!!

Quite clearly a misandric/heterophobic hate crime.

No different to someone deliberately attacking someone because they're homosexual or because of their race.

Just read the article again and realised he was totally innocent!

Other newspapers are reporting it more clearly:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...tupid-man.html

Quote from Zuberi

Three bloodthirsty dykes beat down a man for a cheap thrill?

Too bad I wasn't their to lower the boom on all three of those carpet munching dogs!!!!

Now don't be shy say exactly what you mean!!LOL

From the toilet roll of newspapers;
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...tupid-man.html

'There was some abuse in the first place but the action you took was completely over the top.'

Really?
What was the initial action that was deemed "abuse"?

The alleged "one of the group whistled at a woman dancing by the window",
that the "wrongly believed?

Fish factory worker Edwards(ironic) - the only one of the women with a job - told police that Mr Tailby and his friends had been verbally abusing them and calling them lesbians.

Really? Are they, IN FACT, lesbians? What's the problem?
Oh right, either they despise the idea of being falsly accused of despicable behavior, self-loath their "chosen" lot in life, or believe "certain words" are forbidden, ONLY for people not like us.
I have no reason whatsoever to believe her relative interpretation testemony of events, from someone clearly drunk-in-public at the time.

Oh, THREE people were involved in the commission of felonious assault and battery?
In the US, that qualifies for "special" RICO conspiracy status.
Add the "special" HATE crime status.

Oh, right, suspended sentance........

Let's just write this "judge's" behavior - "special" Cognitive Unity-Not Thinking Sentencing shall we?
Apparently the pussy pass meme has lost it's ability to elicit any sense of shame.

I'm not being intentionally nasty, but when I saw this picture...







I thought it was a snap of the VICTIM (Mr. Tailby)... Then I read the caption, and realised it was one of the 'women'...

One who had said "all men are stupid" - but somehow, looks incredibly alike to those she hates so much.

Quote from Daveyone

Now don't be shy say exactly what you mean!!LOL

You don't want me to say what I really mean.....

why do these headlines portray the scenario that if these women would have beat the ,"right", guy...it would have been ok?

.........or is that just me?

Spot on Outdoors, that icked me the wrong way, too.

It all falls into the "women beating men - hillarious"-category.

Are you sure that they were women? By the looks of the pics, it doesn't look that way. jk