Whew! Well, I had to refill my Diet Coke, but I made it through.

Very good article. I think he makes some great, very accurate points. I've also noticed the careful, PC stance that many in the father's rights movement tend to take....they make my nice, tame little blog look down-right radical.

There's a tendency to remain very carefully on the "right" side of public opinion. I understand why this is so, they don't want to do anything that will hurt their cases and they're struggling desperately to gain public support, but public support won't come until the public sees the truth in all it's ugly and horrific detail.

I've also noticed that on many boards there seems to be a strong aversion to activism. Aside from here, most places I post different activist threads, I tend to recieve little response, and often a negative response (i.e., why bother, what good will it do......).

As Mark has pointed out, we need to call it what it is. It's a war on fathers and an attack on men. There's no need to make it all nice and palatable because it's NOT nice and palatable. It's ugly, evil and insidious and that point is what needs to be driven home.