I suspect you're being a tiny bit ironic here pjanus.
Why? Because the article is a wonderful example of revisionist junk journalism.
But I'd walk a few blocks with the last guy:
Quote:
I'm a psychiatrist and twice divorced against my wishes father of now four young successful adult children. As divorce goes, mine were amicably settled out of court with both sides very satisfied with the financial and custody arrangements. Nevertheless the children and I suffered the loss that emotional magical connection with happens with a loving father involved in their daily lives in an intact marriage. This article offers some sound practical advice but its underlying premise divorce "can make (the father child relationship) better" is utter nonsense.
Mark Klein, M.D., Oakland, California
|
Agreed, but I'd first ask him why he needs to say "I'm a psychiatrist" to validate his response. We already know the answer - who is going to listen to a mere 'father'? It's just not enough.
People like Ms Carol, that write this tasteless fastfood for the brain as if they were flipping psychological burgers, do us no service.
Tips for divorced dads is a gross insult to honourable men. The implication is that we all must accept the great invulnerable divorce industry as a 'universal given' and get along with it as best we can - with helpful hints from the likes of the arrogant and insular Ms clever-clever Carol.
Yep! That's what we've we've all been waiting for - new and better ways to become enslaved to the Marxist-
Feminist State.
Tell us more. We're stupid don'tcher know. We really believe it.
After all, our natural proclivity is to be rapists and child molesters that munch burgers and watch sport. Where would we be if didn't have half-educated journalists to teach us how to become real men?
